Green Bay Forum

Full Version: JC & WW on Vax & Eugenics
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
James Corbett and Whitney Webb take you down the rabbit hole of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine and its “non-profit” nature.

But once you peel back the layers of obfuscation you quickly find not only the profit motive hiding underneath, but the dark specter of eugenics. Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout joins us to discuss her recent article, “Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/jam...ics-links/

This is a video about 36 minutes that is filled with more than you can possibly absorb in that short time frame.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-corbett-report/

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE

Folks, save yourself some time. I wasted about 15mins reading the Unlimtedhangout.com article. Brutal
Killing the messenger when you have no argument.
Nope it was a warning. There was nothing to argue about.
It was a extremely convoluted tale of guilt by association. And that is a nice review.
Guilt of what?
Maybe you can explain just like you explained those 'buttload of cases' regarding legislatures and voting . Oh, that's right, given opportunity after opportunity you came up with nothing. Inexplicable.
(02-25-2021, 10:06 PM)k.d. Wrote: [ -> ]Guilt of what?
Maybe you can explain just like you explained those 'buttload of cases' regarding legislatures and voting . Oh, that's right, given opportunity after opportunity you came up with nothing. Inexplicable.
The word was probably an exaggeration. Are you denying that Thomas' dissenting opinion has not is just that, a dissenting opinion ? Past courts have disagreed. Creating that other word.

Adequate and independent state ground - Wikipedia
Quote:Are you denying that Thomas' dissenting opinion has not is just that, a dissenting opinion ? 
This sentence makes no sense,
(02-26-2021, 09:37 AM)k.d. Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:Are you denying that Thomas' dissenting opinion has not is just that, a dissenting opinion ? 
This sentence makes no sense,

You are a child's child.

BTW a comma at the end of what I believe you meant to be "sentence" makes no sense.
has not is.