Judge Amy Berman Jackson strikes again - CNNPolitics
Quote:Known for her sharp criticism of the Trump administration's moves and in the criminal proceedings of former Trump advisers Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, Jackson this week cut through Washington's noise again as she called former Attorney General William Barr's considerations for rolling out the Mueller report "public relations" in a records access lawsuit opinion.
Days later, in the criminal cases of two January 6 US Capitol riot defendants, she noted how former President Donald Trump was continuing to spread lies, potentially inspiring his supporters to strike again.
Trump "continues to propagate the lie that inspired the attack on a near daily basis," she wrote in an opinion Thursday keeping riot defendant Karl Dresch in jail. "And the anger surrounding the false accusation continues to be stoked by multiple media outlets as well as the state and federal party leaders who are intent on censuring those who dare to challenge the former President's version of events."
That's an absolute joke. If she's so interested in justice and law and order she should focus on the Biden Crime Family.
(05-31-2021, 04:31 PM)k.d. Wrote: [ -> ]That's an absolute joke. If she's so interested in justice and law and order she should focus on the Biden Crime Family.
She's a judge. There would need to be criminal charges.
Corrupt Obama-appointed judge Amy Berman Jackson on Wednesday barred Roger Stone’s defense lawyers from tying their case to the bogus Russian collusion witch hunt.
Stone was accused of making a false statement related to the Russian collusion canard but Judge Jackson said his defense lawyers are not allowed to bring up the fact that the government was never able to show proof the Russians were behind the ‘stolen’ emails given to WikiLeaks.
Even worse, Judge Amy Berman Jackson was assigned to Roger Stone’s case because she was also assigned to Mueller’s case against the 12 Russian GRU officers — so the Deep State is allowed to link the judge based on both cases, but Roger Stone is not allowed to link the cases as part of his defense.
Roger Stone was charged as part of the investigation of Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, but jurors at his November trial won’t hear much about that probe after a federal judge barred his lawyers from basing their defense on what it failed to conclusively prove.
Stone, an ally of President Donald Trump, was accused of undermining a Congressional investigation into whether Russians stole information from Democratic Party computers to supply damaging information to WikiLeaks. His lawyers say any lies he told the panel weren’t important if the U.S. couldn’t prove the Russians were behind the hack.
“This indictment does not charge Roger Stone with conspiracy related to the hacking or anything else,” Jackson said, referring to the case against the Russian GRU officers, saying “we are not going to have that trial in this court room until the defendants are present.”
Judge Amy Berman Jackson previously hit Roger Stone with a gag order and threatened to put him in jail.
(06-01-2021, 01:50 PM)k.d. Wrote: [ -> ]Corrupt Obama-appointed judge Amy Berman Jackson on Wednesday barred Roger Stone’s defense lawyers from tying their case to the bogus Russian collusion witch hunt.
Stone was accused of making a false statement related to the Russian collusion canard but Judge Jackson said his defense lawyers are not allowed to bring up the fact that the government was never able to show proof the Russians were behind the ‘stolen’ emails given to WikiLeaks.
Even worse, Judge Amy Berman Jackson was assigned to Roger Stone’s case because she was also assigned to Mueller’s case against the 12 Russian GRU officers — so the Deep State is allowed to link the judge based on both cases, but Roger Stone is not allowed to link the cases as part of his defense.
Roger Stone was charged as part of the investigation of Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, but jurors at his November trial won’t hear much about that probe after a federal judge barred his lawyers from basing their defense on what it failed to conclusively prove.
Stone, an ally of President Donald Trump, was accused of undermining a Congressional investigation into whether Russians stole information from Democratic Party computers to supply damaging information to WikiLeaks. His lawyers say any lies he told the panel weren’t important if the U.S. couldn’t prove the Russians were behind the hack.
“This indictment does not charge Roger Stone with conspiracy related to the hacking or anything else,” Jackson said, referring to the case against the Russian GRU officers, saying “we are not going to have that trial in this court room until the defendants are present.”
Judge Amy Berman Jackson previously hit Roger Stone with a gag order and threatened to put him in jail.
This happened to Roger Stone ?
Heartwarming !
Figures, it doesn't bother you an innocent man gets railroaded.
Stone is a convicted criminal. Convicted by his peers.
He was set free by Trump by decree, while people are still locked up for carrying a bag of weed.
Quote:The foreperson on the jury that convicted Roger Stone has come forward, and is revealed to be a failed Democrat candidate for Congress and activist vehemently opposed to President Donald Trump.
Tomeka Hart, a former Memphis City Schools Board President, came forward as the Stone jury foreperson in a Facebook post on Wednesday, voicing support for prosecutors in the case.
Hart confirmed to The Daily Memphian that she wrote the Facebook post, but she declined an interview with the newspaper.
Stone supporters were shocked when a review of Hart's social media posts showed that she posted on Twitter mocking Stone's dramatic arrest prior to being seated on the jury, and frequently denounced Trump, including calling the president and his supporters racists.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...ivist.html
Wouldn't call this racist black woman a peer.
Stone either picked the jurors or had "veto" power to deny seating of jurors.
Remember it generally take a unanimous tally to convict.
What were the political leanings of the other jurors ?
How did Stone do on his appeal which he obviously would have requested ?
What kind of chance would anyone have with a corrupt judge and prejudiced, racist jury foreman?