Reasonable request - Printable Version

The following warnings occurred:

Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)

File	Line	Function
/inc/class_error.php	153	errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code	32	errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php	961	eval
/printthread.php	16	require_once

Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)

File	Line	Function
/inc/class_error.php	153	errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code	2	errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php	287	eval
/printthread.php	117	printthread_multipage

Reasonable request - Printable Version

+- Green Bay Forum (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf)
+-- Forum: Lets Talk (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: The Nation (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Thread: Reasonable request (/showthread.php?tid=1340)

Pages: 1 2

Reasonable request - j.p. - 09-25-2020

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/518199-crump-to-ag-cameron-release-the-transcripts

Quote:Civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump had a simple message for Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron ® on Friday: Release the transcript of the grand jury proceedings in the case of Breonna Taylor.

“Did [Cameron] present any evidence on Breonna Taylor’s behalf? Or did he make a unilateral decision to put his thumb on the scales of justice?” Crump, who’s representing Taylor's family, said at a press conference in Louisville.

In one of the more hideous apparent instances of DA/police collusion involving an uber political DA. Just release the transcript, simple. It won't satisfy the insatiable violent protestors, they do owe to the rest of us. I personally can't fathom this innocent unarmed women getting popped 8 eight times and these fine patriots declaring this "self defense".

There must be more to this than we know.

RE: Reasonable request - k.d. - 09-25-2020

What we do know is that the cops had a legitimate 'no-knock' warrant, however they did announce themselves and knock, according to an eye-witness. We also know that her boyfriend started shooting at the cops first. Unfortunately, Taylor was collateral damage, an innocent bystander.

Let me add that I don't agree with no-knock warrants and wish they would be done away with.

RE: Reasonable request - j.p. - 09-25-2020

(09-25-2020, 03:58 PM)k.d. Wrote: What we do know is that the cops had a legitimate 'no-knock' warrant, however they did announce themselves and knock, according to an eye-witness. We also know that her boyfriend started shooting at the cops first. Unfortunately, Taylor was collateral damage, an innocent bystander.

Let me add that I don't agree with no-knock warrants and wish they would be done away with.

I'm not sure what we know and don't know.
My understanding the only video we've seen was leaked to the cops attorney.

RE: Reasonable request - k.d. - 09-25-2020

I know that what I stated are undisputed facts. I've seen no video.

RE: Reasonable request - j.p. - 09-26-2020

(09-25-2020, 10:29 PM)k.d. Wrote: I know that what I stated are undisputed facts. I've seen no video.

Facts ? maybe. But what you posted was not an official account, al least not at this time. It was from the police officer's attorney. And we know lawyers are paid to be biased.

RE: Reasonable request - k.d. - 09-26-2020

What part do you dispute?

RE: Reasonable request - k.d. - 09-26-2020

I've got new information that kinda changes things. While the cops had a warrant, it wasn't for the guy in Taylor's apt.
This explains some stuff and raises some serious questions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tbctVN61r8

RE: Reasonable request - j.p. - 09-27-2020

(09-26-2020, 10:06 AM)k.d. Wrote: What part do you dispute?

The "facts" part.

We still don't have any.

(09-26-2020, 02:41 PM)k.d. Wrote: I've got new information that kinda changes things. While the cops had a warrant, it wasn't for the guy in Taylor's apt.
This explains some stuff and raises some serious questions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tbctVN61r8

I don't think it is relevant who was the drug dealer/thug. We can't have cops running around half-cocked shooting up everything they see.

RE: Reasonable request - k.d. - 09-27-2020

Quote:I don't think it is relevant who was the drug dealer/thug.

I disagree. Had they had the right guy perhaps Taylor wouldn't be dead.

Quote:We can't have cops running around half-cocked shooting up everything they see.

I agree however in this case, the guy shot first and the cops reacted, which is only natural.

RE: Reasonable request - j.p. - 09-27-2020

(09-27-2020, 12:18 PM)k.d. Wrote:
Quote:I don't think it is relevant who was the drug dealer/thug.
I disagree. Had they had the right guy perhaps Taylor wouldn't be dead.

Quote:We can't have cops running around half-cocked shooting up everything they see.

I agree however in this case, the guy shot first and the cops reacted, which is only natural.

It is not "natural" that, presumably trained officers, would be so reckless and indiscriminate. If they had accidentally hit Taylor with a single shot, I might agree with you. But plugging her six times ?

At least a wall got justice.