+- Green Bay Forum (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf)
+-- Forum: Lets Talk (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: World View (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: If your name ain't Fraudci (/showthread.php?tid=2537)
Pages:
1
2
RE: If your name ain't Fraudci - k.d. - 01-04-2022
source for each of the individual 89 ships.
RE: If your name ain't Fraudci - j.p. - 01-04-2022
I, like you, don't know. You made it a thing, now defend it.
We do know the CDC's threshold for investigation. Normal people would agree that it is pretty damn low.
RE: If your name ain't Fraudci - k.d. - 01-05-2022
Quote:The ships were investigated because the infected was more than .10 of 1 % of the occupants. Which means the that the non-affected could be 99.999 %Source. Where did you get this regarding 89 separate ships? More trolling bullshit.
RE: If your name ain't Fraudci - j.p. - 01-05-2022
(01-05-2022, 01:08 AM)k.d. Wrote:Quote:The ships were investigated because the infected was more than .10 of 1 % of the occupants. Which means the that the non-affected could be 99.999 %Source. Where did you get this regarding 89 separate ships? More trolling bullshit.
If you want data on a ship. Why do you keep bringing up 89 as if it has significance?