The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/printthread.php 16 require_once
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Green Bay Forum
New exotic vacationland - Printable Version

+- Green Bay Forum (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf)
+-- Forum: Lets Talk (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: World View (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: New exotic vacationland (/showthread.php?tid=936)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: New exotic vacationland - j.p. - 02-11-2020

(02-11-2020, 12:22 PM)k.d. Wrote: Either that or simply realize that there are anomalies in weather patterns.
Below is a quote of what I said early up the thread, take a look. Seems to mean anomaly to me.


"Yes. One time events mean nothing."

RE: New exotic vacationland - k.d. - 02-11-2020

Quote:"Yes. One time events mean nothing."
That's why you started a thread about it.

RE: New exotic vacationland - j.p. - 02-11-2020

Wasn't about that at all. You have to read the article to understand. It didn't have much to do with a 65 degree day.

RE: New exotic vacationland - k.d. - 02-11-2020

"Antarctica just hit 65 degrees, its warmest temperature ever recorded"
Give it up. This was the lede. And it continued with more global warming junk science and on top of that, it was published by Bezo's Washington Post which is simply a PR firm for the government. No credibility.
Unfortunately you don't recognize propaganda when you see it.

RE: New exotic vacationland - j.p. - 02-11-2020

(02-11-2020, 06:03 PM)k.d. Wrote: "Antarctica just hit 65 degrees, its warmest temperature ever recorded"
Give it up. This was the lede. And it continued with more global warming junk science and on top of that, it was published by Bezo's Washington Post which is simply a PR firm for the government. No credibility.
Unfortunately you don't recognize propaganda when you see it.
It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.

We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).

The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.

Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?

RE: New exotic vacationland - k.d. - 02-12-2020

Quote:effectively written by 3 scientists because the article made absolutely no mention of the science


RE: New exotic vacationland - j.p. - 02-12-2020

(02-12-2020, 12:05 AM)k.d. Wrote:
Quote:effectively written by 3 scientists because the article made absolutely no mention of the science
yet another dishonest parsing of words to change the meaning

RE: New exotic vacationland - k.d. - 02-12-2020

These are your words, not mine. This is exactly the gist of your constant contradictions and wanting to put two opposite thoughts in every post. Own it.

RE: New exotic vacationland - j.p. - 02-12-2020

Those are my words ? Point it out


"It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.

We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).

The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.

Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?"
(02-12-2020, 11:47 AM)j.p. Wrote: Those are my words ? Point it out


"It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.

We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).

The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.

Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?"

While you at it. Point out what you believe is a contradiction.

RE: New exotic vacationland - k.d. - 02-12-2020

Quote:We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).
Posted by j.p. - Today, 04:25 AM
I've read the article in its entirety 4 times and it gets dumber every time.

Every thing in the WAPO is government sanctioned bullshit, regardless of the author - employees or not.