The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.28 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/portal.php 39 require_once




Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 2
» Latest member: stanleypearce
» Forum threads: 2,609
» Forum posts: 11,820

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 107 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 106 Guest(s)
Bing

Latest Threads
RABBI SELLS BUTT PLUGS & ...
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
03-22-2024, 02:10 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
Time for some music
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
03-11-2024, 11:18 PM
» Replies: 17
» Views: 5,297
RIP Eric Carmen
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
03-11-2024, 10:53 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
An Extreme Act of Protest
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
02-26-2024, 05:43 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
Mark Dice 2014
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
02-12-2024, 12:42 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
Do You Fly?
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
01-18-2024, 10:15 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
The Grey Zone
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
01-11-2024, 03:35 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
Jews
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
11-08-2023, 10:49 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
God's Chosen People
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
11-05-2023, 11:58 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0
Gabor Mate
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
11-01-2023, 05:26 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 0

 
  Obama:Big Fat Liar
Posted by: k.d. - 06-04-2019, 09:51 PM - Forum: World View - No Replies

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...sense.html

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/ba...aws-again/

Good luck legally buying a gun over the internet.

Print this item

  Obama's Frauds
Posted by: k.d. - 06-04-2019, 10:35 AM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (8)

Former President Barack Obama is again busy lecturing Americans on politics. His speeches have contained many snappy lines that would deserve attention if they came from an untainted source. But Obama as president was guilty of many of the things against which he now warns his fellow citizens.
Last September, Obama received the Paul H. Douglas Award for Ethics in Government at the University of Illinois in Champagne/Urbana. Obama told students that “the biggest threat to our democracy is cynicism” and called for “a restoration of honesty and decency and lawfulness in our government.”
Obama flailed cynicism as in the glory days of his 2008 presidential campaign. He declared that “making people cynical about government … always works better for those who don’t believe in the power of collective action.” He also warned that “the more cynical people are about government, the angrier and more dispirited they are about the prospects for change, the more likely the powerful are able to maintain their power.”
But his eight years as president fueled the distrust of Washington that Obama now condemns. How can he blame Americans for being cynical after his dozens of false promises, such as “If you like your doctor, you’ll be able to keep your doctor” despite all the mandates in Obamacare? Millions of Americans got shafted by his bait-and-switch. How can he blame Americans for being cynical after his 2016 assertion that “it is easier for a teenager to buy a Glock than get his hands on a computer or even a book”?  Amazon Prime does not offer to send AK-47s, unlike copies of War and Peace and Pride and Prejudice. Or how about in 2015 when he complained about “neighborhoods where it’s easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable.” Obama never offered any evidence that carrots are rarer than .38 Specials. How can he castigate cynics after he campaigned in 2008 on a peace platform and then proceeded to bomb seven nations?
Obama declared in his Illinois speech that Americans are “supposed to stand up to bullies, not follow them.” But Trump won in 2016 in part because many Americans considered the federal government the biggest bully in the land. Obama relied on “bureaucratic bulldozing rather than legislative transparency,” according to the New York Times, issuing 50 percent more “major regulations” than the George W. Bush administration. When Congress refused to accede to his demands, he declared that he would use his pen and phone to rule by executive order.
Obama told the student audience, “Most of you don’t remember a time before 9/11, when you didn’t have to take off your shoes at an airport.” Did the students realize that the Transportation Security Administration became far more punitive and intrusive during Obama’s presidency? Obama appointees brought in Whole Body scanners across the nation and entitled TSA agents to aggressively touch travelers’ genitals and breasts. But despite all that additional power and groping, TSA remained the poster boy for incompetence: TSA checkpoints still failed to detect 95 percent of smuggled guns and bombs. But because Obama never went through a TSA checkpoint as president, the abuses didn’t exist — at least not for him.
Information and the press
Obama also told University of Illinois students that “democracy depends on transparency and accountability” and said, “It shouldn’t be Democratic or Republican to say that we don’t threaten the freedom of the press because they say things or publish stories we don’t like.” But despite boasting of  “the most transparent administration ever,” Obama expanded federal secrecy and prosecuted more journalists and whistleblowers than any previous administration. Obama appointees helped turn the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) into a charade. The Associated Press reported in 2015 that the Obama administration “set a record again for censoring government files or outright denying access to them” under FOIA. The State Department ignored 17 FOIA requests for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails before 2014 and insisted it required 75 years to disclose emails of Clinton’s top aides. When Obama took office, the United States had the 20th-most free press in the world, according to the Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index. By 2016, it had fallen to 41st — worse than South Africa and barely ahead of Botswana. Obama appointees severely undermined the Freedom of Information Act.
As the audience cheered him on, Obama declared, “It should not be a partisan issue to say that we do not pressure the attorney general or the FBI to use the criminal justice system as a cudgel.” Trump’s declarations about federal prosecutions are appalling. But while the FBI was investigating the legality of Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Obama repeatedly publicly declared that she had committed no crime. The Inspector General report released last June revealed that, after a half-hearted probe, the FBI planned to absolve Clinton unless she openly confessed to wrongdoing when FBI agents finally talked to her. That is not routine FBI procedure though perhaps there is a secret protocol for such cases.
Obama declared in Illinois that “in a government of and by and for the people, there should be no permanent ruling class. There are only citizens, who through their elected and temporary representatives, determine our course and determine our character.” The perception that Obama had designated Hillary Clinton as his successor helped undermine potential Democratic Party challengers to her nomination. If Clinton had been elected, then the United States would have had a stretch of 24 out of 32 years in which two politically connected families stocked the White House — too close for comfort to a “permanent ruling class.” The façade of an FBI investigation of Clinton’s email
shenanigans helped ensure for her the Democratic Party presidential nomination and, indirectly, paved the way to a Trump presidency.
Obama lamented, “Cynicism led too many people to turn away from politics and stay home on Election Day.” But many Americans boycotted the 2016 election because they believed that the major parties offered them merely a choice of liars and scoundrels.  In 2015, Obama offered an easy solution to that problem in another speech in Illinois: make voting mandatory.
And in his January 10, 2017, farewell address, he gibed those who “blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them.” But Obama never examined his role in covering up the crimes and other abuses of one of the 2016 candidates. In his Illinois speech, he lamented that the news “makes a lot of people feel like the fix is in and the game is rigged and nobody’s looking out for them.” Legions of Democratic voters felt that way after WikiLeaks exposed the Democratic National Committee’s emails that proved that the 2016 primaries had been rigged in favor of Clinton.
Killing and spying
Obama has gotten an almost free pass from the media on his dubious declarations the past couple years. In that 2017 farewell address, he boasted, “We have taken out tens of thousands of terrorists.” Was he counting the wedding parties blown up by drones on his watch?
Obama administration lawyers asserted a right to kill U.S. citizens whom it labeled terrorist suspects without trial, without notice, and without any chance for the marked men to legally object. At least five Americans died in Obama-era drone attacks, including a 16-year-old boy. Drone strikes increased tenfold under Obama, helping fuel anti–U.S. backlashes in several nations. Obama personally chose who would be killed at weekly “Terror Tuesday” White House meetings that featured PowerPoint death parades of potential targets. The CIA often did not know whom it was killing but counted all adult males “in a strike zone as combatants … unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent,” the New York Times noted.  The Times also revealed that U.S. “counterterrorism officials insist …  people in an area of known terrorist activity … are probably up to no good.”  The “probably up to no good” standard absolved almost any drone killing within thousands of square miles in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.
Some Obama defenders may insist that his anti-terrorist policies were necessary to achieve bipartisan political support. But there’s no excuse for his prying into average Americans’ lives. Prior to becoming president, Obama pledged “no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens.” But after taking his oath of office, he quickly perpetuated and expanded some of the most sweeping and extreme Bush administration surveillance programs. Obama’s Justice Department secretly decreed that all phone records of all Americans were “relevant” to terrorism investigations and thus that the National Security Administration (NSA) could justifiably seize everyone’s personal data.
In 2013, thanks to former NSA analyst Edward Snowden, Americans learned that the NSA can tap almost any cell phone in the world, exploit computer games such as Angry Birds to poach personal data, access anyone’s email and web-browsing history, and crack the vast majority of computer encryption. Obama went on Jay Leno’s Tonight Show and ludicrously announced, “There is no spying on Americans,” while his appointees insisted that the NSA targeted only persons linked to terrorism. But the NSA’s definition of “terrorist suspect” was ludicrously broad, including “someone searching the web for suspicious stuff.”
In his farewell address in January 2017, Obama appealed to “the rule of law that holds leaders accountable.” But Obama helped establish an Impunity Democracy in which rulers pay no price for their misdeeds. The Obama “administration fought in court to prevent any ruling that the defunct practices [such as torture and detaining Americans arrested at home as ‘enemy combatants’] had been illegal,” as Charlie Savage noted in the New York Times a week after the 2016 election. ACLU executive director Anthony Romero lamented, “Obama’s failure to rein in George Bush’s national-security policies hands Donald Trump a fully loaded weapon.”
In his speech to the 2016 Democratic National Convention, Obama declared, “We don’t look to be ruled.” Unfortunately, this lofty sentiment was scorned more than it was heeded during his presidency.
The lies that Obama told while he was president help explain why only 20 percent of Americans trusted the federal government at the end of his presidency. Who cares if an ex-president belatedly cheers for transparency and accountability? Obama has never admitted that his policies made the federal government more dangerous at home and abroad. Nothing that Donald Trump can do or say should be permitted to expunge Obama’s derelictions.

Written by James Bovard
Anyone who has read Mr. Bovard's books realizes he deals only in facts, not opinions.

Print this item

  Hostile Foreign Power ?
Posted by: j.p. - 06-04-2019, 08:19 AM - Forum: World View - Replies (11)

TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): When the United States is attacked by a hostile foreign power, it must strike back. And make no mistake Mexico is a hostile foreign power. For decades the Mexican government has sent its poor north to our country. This has allowed that country's criminal oligarchy to maintain power and get even richer but at great expense to us. The flood of illegal workers into the United States has damaged our communities, ruined our schools, burdened our health care system and fractured our national unity

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2019/...ack/223846

Print this item

  Abortion Free Mo
Posted by: k.d. - 05-28-2019, 12:31 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

St. Louis, Missouri — The last remaining abortion clinic in Missouri says it expects to be shut down this week, effectively ending legal abortion in the state.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/planned-par...019-05-28/

Print this item

  Rename those streets and schools
Posted by: k.d. - 05-27-2019, 07:01 PM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (10)

Tear down those statues and erase MLK Day. Why would you want to be associated with this guy?

FBI recordings indicate Martin Luther King, Jr. had over FORTY affairs and accuse MLK of watching and laughing as a fellow "pastor" raped a woman. The tapes further reveal that the paid communist agitator engaged in orgies and normal and abnormal sexual activities (whatever the hell that is supposed to be). It has been known since the huge marches and rallies of the 1960's that night time brought marathon sexual parties complete with "gangbangs" and other deviant sexual practices by the "marchers and supporters". The MSM rarely ever talks about these happenings. MLK was a regular participant. In his 1989 book And The Walls Came Tumbling Down long time friend and confidant of MLK, Ralph Abernathy exposed King as a man who suffered from temptation. He outlined how King had a severe "weakness" with women. Abernathy also stated in his book that King was with not one, but six different women the night before he was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee. Below is a photo and a caption caught on one of the many FBI tapes in Washington, D.C. in 1968. The FBI even sent King an anonymous copy of this particular statement telling King "you are finished" and "you should go ahead and kill yourself".

Print this item

  He Built a Wall
Posted by: k.d. - 05-27-2019, 11:26 AM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (1)

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...ew-mexico/
There ya go.

Print this item

  Casey on a Few Issues
Posted by: k.d. - 05-19-2019, 05:17 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

Justin’s note: Elizabeth Warren could cost America trillions of dollars.
Warren is, of course, a Democratic senator from Massachusetts. She’s also running for president.
And like many fellow Democrats, she’s full of wacky ideas. Most recently, she made waves by saying she wants to forgive more than $1 trillion worth of student loans if she becomes president. She also wants to issue reparations to African Americans, which could also cost trillions.
These sorts of ideas used to be considered extreme. A candidate would get laughed out of the race for suggesting them. But those days are over.
A recent poll found that just 27% of Americans oppose Warren’s debt forgiveness plan. As for reparations? Well, fellow Democratic presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris both support the idea.
Of course, not everyone’s a fan of these ideas. Doug Casey is one of those people. Below, Doug tells me why these ideas are not only ridiculous but destructive. He also tells me why he thinks Warren is part of a much bigger problem.


Justin: Doug, what do you make of Elizabeth Warren’s plan to forgive student loans? Surely, student loans are a major problem.
But I’m not sure this is the best solution. What do you think?
Doug: Well, it makes perverse sense that she’d suggest something like this. After all, a new Democratic presidential candidate enters the race every day now. I think we’re up to 22 candidates now. But who’s counting?
They seem to be competing with each other in an actual freak show. The Evil Party is trotting out its most bizarre nomenklatura, each trying to outdo the other in being socialist, black, queer, transgender friendly, or a professional female. By which I mean a female who parades as a female for a living. They’re vying over who has the most outlandish, rabid and nonsensical ideas about how they’re going to transform the very nature of what’s left of the United States.
Meanwhile, the Stupid Party, the right wing of the Demopublicans, populated by neocons, has-beens, and assorted non-entities, seems mainly interested in hyping the stock market with phony money, and looking for a major war somewhere in the world.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) kind of set the tone for all this. It amazes me that a 29-year-old Puerto Rican bartender comes from out of nowhere, apparently as a result of an actual casting call, and now everybody in the country takes her ideas seriously.
Perhaps the most stupid of her ideas is Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). This basically amounts to unlimited printing of dollars.
All these other candidates have to call her bet, raise it, and wait for the next player to reraise. They all have some signature goofball idea at this point.
Justin: Or two goofy ideas in the case of Elizabeth Warren.
Doug: Right. Let’s start with the notion of forgiving student debt.
The idea of everybody going to college should be a non-starter. Instead it’s being sold as some kind of human right. In today’s world, it only extends adolescence, in a Petri dish where impressionable kids are indoctrinated by their Marxist-leaning profs. Students incubate in the fetid academic womb for four years. I understand – it can be fun. Drink, party, do drugs, get laid, sleep in, go to the gym. Repeat daily. Don’t worry about the cost, because it’s financed on the Never-Never plan. Sweet.
Some people hang around another eight or even ten years. They become perpetual students and generally don’t learn things that have actual value in the real world. Soft pseudo studies like sociology, political science, psych, gender studies, or English come to mind. I won’t even mention economics, where you not only learn nothing of value from Keynesians, but most likely the opposite of the truth. You don’t have to even think about your loans till you’re out. Then maybe get some kind of government employment to have them forgiven, or further deferred. Great way to waste your life at public expense. With the approval of both your parents and society.
Incidentally, if you’re interested in these subjects, you can learn far more by reading independently, quite frankly. But knowledge isn’t the object with this game. It’s a credential, and credentialism is a fraud. I can’t even find my diploma from Georgetown. I only wish I’d had good counsel in high school. I wouldn’t have misallocated four years of time and a lot of money that way. But today the mistake of college is far, far worse than it was in the ’60s.
There’s much more I can say about education. But there’s absolutely no reason why there should be $1.5 trillion worth of student loans outstanding. It’s not a sign of a well-educated country. It’s evidence of stupidity and corruption.
The fact is that if you’re worth anything, you educate yourself. Sitting in a classroom for six hours a day listening to professors drone on doesn’t constitute an education, especially today when almost all of the professors are cultural Marxists. College doesn’t just present zero value today. It offers negative value.
Having said that, I hasten to make an exception for science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) degrees. For those subjects, it’s very helpful to learn in a formal structured environment, where labs are available.
The vast majority of people shouldn’t go to college. If I had to do it all over again, I wouldn’t have marched off to college. I would have used that money and time to do something much more productive, interesting, and fun than college.
But getting back to Elizabeth Warren. Forgiving student loans would be disastrous. First of all because it would encourage more kids to go to college.
Second, forgiving loans shields people from the idea that their actions have consequences. These people wanted to go to college to get a piece of vellum. They borrowed money for it. They’ve found it’s of very little value. Now, they want somebody else to pay the consequences. I say, Tough! It’s now time to pay the piper.
But they don’t want to, and are being encouraged not to. That sends an extremely bad moral signal. It’s a further sign of the moral collapse of the U.S., which is an even bigger deal than the coming financial collapse. In fact, you can plan your life around most of these loans being defaulted on during the next stage of The Greater Depression. Since the U.S. Government isn’t going to get the money anyway, it’s clever of Warren to get in front of the situation.
That’s the main issue. But there are other things that make loan forgiveness a disastrous idea. Colleges and universities shouldn’t be expensive in the first place. But they are, due to government intervention into that marketplace. By granting those loans, artificially creating demand.
Justin: I agree that the government sowed the seeds of the student loan crisis. It created the mess we find ourselves in.
So it’s wishful thinking to think the government can fix this problem. If anything, it’ll screw things up even more.
Unfortunately, most people don’t see it like that. They view the government as some sort of cure-all.
Doug: That’s absolutely right. But let’s look down the road a few years. It’s great luck for the current crop of fools to have $1.5 trillion wiped off their liabilities. But what happens to people who go to college in the future? How are they supposed to pay for college? What’s the point of a loan if it’s automatically forgiven?
What will happen is the government – or rather the taxpayers, or the Fed through money-printing – will wind up paying for everybody’s college education.
Then the State has a perfect right to control what’s taught, and how much, to whom. It will further homogenize the nature of the education because it’s considered important that everybody gets the same product. It will be pretty hard to deny someone a four-year vacation, pretty much the way it is for high school today. Increasingly a college degree will just be a sign of time served. Worth even less than it is today.
“Free” college will further politicize education. Politicizing, or “democratizing” in the current idiom, is always a disastrous idea from about a hundred different points of view. But Boobus americanus will go for it because they have this mistaken idea that there’s a direct cause and effect relationship between going to college and being successful in life. In fact, that relationship doesn’t exist.
In my experience, people who go to college and became successful would almost certainly have been successful anyway. It wasn’t college that made them successful. It’s the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc – after something, therefore because of it – in action.
The whole system is already terminally corrupt. Free school only makes it worse. People don’t value anything that’s free. In fact, they tend to treat it, and anybody that passes it out to them, with a form of contempt. Why? There has to be some kind of voluntary exchange in any moral relationship. Or a master-slave, conman-mark, patron-client, politico-voter relationship is implied. And the result is resentment.
I don’t know if Warren has got a criminal mentality or whether she’s just criminally stupid, but this is an idea that is almost as bad as AOC’s MMT idea.
Justin: I actually think this idea goes hand in hand with MMT. How else is the government going to pay off everyone’s debts? The way I see it, it’ll have no choice but to fire up the printing press again.
Same goes for reparations, which would reportedly cost trillions of dollars. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
But why stop there? Why not forgive credit card debt while they’re at it? Same goes for the people who went deep into debt to buy a car they can’t afford. Those people surely need help, too.
So it’s hard to say where the line is drawn. Maybe there isn’t one.
Doug: You’re absolutely right. It’s a matter of moral principle. Once you cross the line it’s a slippery slope. And what about the people who can’t afford the mortgage on their house? Everybody needs a place to live, so surely the government should kiss that and make it better too.
Eventually, they’ll tie in a guaranteed monthly income. I guess nobody is going to have to work at that point. There’s absolutely no end to any of this. Everyone can just sit around Starbucks all day playing with their iPhones.
It will be fascinating to watch all this play out. I consider it free entertainment, aside from the fact that my taxes are going up as a result of this. But I hope to be at a safe distance when it blows up.
Justin: And what about Warren’s other bright idea: issuing reparations. Are living descendants of slaves or those who have suffered from the ills of racial discrimination entitled to some sort of compensation?
Doug: This is a lot like witnessing a hurricane that’s followed by a string of tornadoes, then a major war, and finally a plague. It’s hard to know which is worse.
In an environment of identity politics, which we now have in the U.S. and across the Western world, you’re no longer an individual human being. You’re a member of an identity group, first and foremost. Those groups are based on religion, gender, or more often than not race.
When you get into reparations based on what happened to somebody’s ancestors, there’s no limit to where you can take this. What’s happening in the Middle East between the Palestinians and the Israelis is a perfect example. Palestinians and Israelis still believe it goes back to who righteously smote who starting about 3,000 years ago.
Everybody’s ancestors stole land from other ancestors, who then stole it back, and who stole it back again and again. Then some outside tribe – the Huns, the Vikings, the Mongols, and a hundred others come along and steal it from both.
This sort of irrational emotion, masquerading as thought, winds up in a perpetual war of all against all. The Identity Politics/Reparation crowd is creating a Hatfields and McCoy environment between racial groups.
Everybody’s ancestors have been conquered by some other group.
The Irish should want reparations from the English. The French should want reparations from the Germans. That worked out really well after World War I, as we know. The Russians should want reparations from the Mongols. The Romans should want reparations from the Goths.
The question is how far back you take this ridiculous fantasy. But ridiculous isn’t even the right word. It’s evil and necessarily destructive.
It’s the idea that somebody else is responsible for any problems that I have. And that somebody else has got to be made to pay for it at gunpoint, because I think my great-grandfather got a raw deal.
This is entirely apart from the fact that the slaves who came over from Africa were actually the lucky ones.
Justin: How were they the lucky ones?
Doug: Slavery has been rampant throughout the entire world since the dawn of history. It’s not just something between Europeans and Africans. In fact, Western Civilization is what abolished slavery starting in about the 18th C. Africa was rife with slavery between Africans, and then with kind and gentle Islamic traders stealing slaves. It was an institution. And oddly the West is blamed for solving it.
The slaves who were shipped from Africa to the U.S. were the lucky ones. Now, slaves didn’t have good conditions anywhere, but an American black slave was far better off than if he had stayed in Africa. Actually, he was enslaved in Africa. He was just subsequently sold to North American buyers.
Anybody who’s been to Africa today realizes that American blacks are an order of magnitude better off than any of their brothers back in the dark continent, or maybe two orders of magnitude. Reparations are a completely ridiculous idea, indefensible historically, economically, and – most important – morally. It’s going to do nothing but foment more race hatred.
One more thing. People don’t realize it, but the United States is the only country in the world – with the exception of ever-disastrous Haiti – where it took a war to abolish slavery. Even though 90% of slaves went to Brazil or the Caribbean, where they were worse off than the English colonies. In Brazil, slavery was abolished peacefully in 1888, 25 years after the U.S. At a time when Brazil was based much more on slavery than the South.
Most people are also unaware of the fact that the last country in the world to officially abolish slavery was Mauritania. It did so in 1981, although in Mauritania, as in many countries in Africa, slavery still exists today. It’s traditional. It’s just not enforced by the law anymore. But it exists just as much as it did before. I spent a week there a couple of years ago.
Types like Warren – er, Pocahontas – who are looking for “reparations,” are ignorant rabble rousers and race hate mongers. Their intention isn’t to improve things, but make things worse in just about every way possible. I mean, yeah, I actually think that – just like AOC – Elizabeth Warren is clearly an evil person with bad intentions. I don’t even give her the benefit of the doubt, by saying that she’s well-intentioned but has made some mistakes. No, to come up with ideas like hers means that you’re purposefully trying to create a disaster; that’s the definition of an evil person.
But she’s just a symptom. The real problem is the degraded state of the U.S. itself.
Justin: Thanks for speaking with me today, Doug.
Doug: You’re welcome.
Reprinted with permission from Casey Research.

Print this item

  Is it a life or isn't it ?
Posted by: j.p. - 05-17-2019, 07:42 PM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (25)

How could these centralists in Mizzou and others possibly make an exception for rape and incest ?

Print this item

  A Bernie Bio
Posted by: k.d. - 05-14-2019, 09:46 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

Bernie Sanders is truly special. He never held a job until he was finally elected mayor at age 53. He lived off of welfare and four different women, had a child out-of-wedlock with one and the three marriages did not work out.
In all his years in the Senate, he introduced 364 bills. 3 passed. Two of those were to name post offices. If you want to know what kind of leader Bernie is,
Go to Wikipedia, it’s a long report. The following is condensed:
Bernie Sanders’ father was a high school drop-out, who tormented his family with rants about their financial problems.
He blamed society and economic inequality for his plight, though as a white male in a middle class neighborhood, he was hardly among the downtrodden.
This was Bernie’s inspiration to take up the cause of economic justice, though he would spend half of his life as an able-bodied college graduate living off of unemployment checks, and the women in his life, between odd jobs.
By his own admission, Bernie was not a great student, starting at Brooklyn College and transferring to Univ. of Chicago, but his enrollment kept him protected from the draft.
He joined socialist organizations and dabbled in far-left communist politics, gaining national notoriety by petitioning the school to let students have sex in the dormitories.
This was before birth control and abortion were legal, when there were still very serious repercussions for women if the condom broke, but that didn’t stop him from crusading against those silly rules that were an obstacle to his own satisfaction.
He participated in the 1963 March on Washington, a few demonstrations, and was arrested once, but his activism for civil rights ended when he became obsessed with socialism. NOT “democratic socialism”, but oppressive far-left Marxism.
Bernie married his college sweetheart, Deborah Shilling, and spent his small inheritance on a summer home in Vermont on 85 acres.
The shack had a dirt floor and no electricity, maintaining his proletariat credibility, but not impressing his new bride.
He refused to get a steady job, so his wife didn’t stick around long, divorced after 18 months.
The Viet Nam war was escalating, and when the next draft was announced, Bernie applied for a conscientious objector deferment.
His deferment was denied, so he dodged the draft by having a kid out of wedlock in 1969 with his new girlfriend, Susan Mott, even though he STILL wasn’t working, and had no way to support the child. By the time his draft number came up, he was too old to be drafted anyway.
He continued to subsist on odd carpentry jobs and unemployment checks, and occasionally selling $15 articles, including the one about how women fantasize about gang rape. He still refused to get a steady job to support his child. His girlfriend left him.
In 1988 he married Jane Driscoll,and took a cold-war era honeymoon in communist USSR.
His new wife supported Bernie financially through his many attempts to win a public office, and shared his radical leftist political views.
They visited the pro-Soviet Sandinista Government in Nicaragua known for their human rights violations, support for anti-American terrorists, and the imprisonment and exile of opponents. Bernie blindly overlooked the carnage to stand with fellow socialists.
They traveled to Cuba in hopes of meeting Bernie’s hero Fidel Castro, but access to him was denied.
Bernie Sanders managed not to hold a full-time job his entire life or vote in a single election, until he finally ran for Mayor of Burlington at the age of 40.
After several failed elections, he finally won the office of Mayor of Burlington, VT, and eventually a Senate seat, which he has managed to keep off and on.
For all of his years representing Vermont, Bernie Sanders passed a total of three bills, and two of them were for naming post offices.
He’s a draft-dodging deadbeat dad, a globe-trotting communist dilettante, and a petulant detractor of hard-working honorable Democrats.
His one skill is yelling about how unfair the world is, and how everything SHOULD be.
But he has no plans for how to make it happen, and no idea what goes on in the rest of the world or how to deal with problems overseas.
His excuse for not having a foreign policy or national security plank on his platform: “I’ve only been campaigning for three months.”
His socialist friends are bitter about what they see as a betrayal of their values by Bernie’s pursuit of the Democratic nomination.
His former wife and girlfriend run when they see reporters and will not speak to the press.

Bernie’s past, including a brief stint living in a kibbutz in Israel is cloaked in secrecy. (It worked for B Hussein Obama.)
Former employees and coworkers describe him as hostile and belligerent. All of the Democrats in Vermont’s government endorsed Hillary Clinton.
The people who know Bernie best cannot stand him. His supporters cannot explain how he is qualified to be president.
As for his detractors, we can only watch in horror as this Nader 2.0 works an appalling act of sabotage on the United States.

Print this item

  Sandy the Joker
Posted by: k.d. - 05-13-2019, 08:13 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

Ocasio-Cortez: I Was Joking About The World Ending In 12 Years, And You're An Idiot If You Believed Me

https://www.dailywire.com/news/47098/oca...=dwtwitter

Print this item