Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.



Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 6
» Latest member: icons370
» Forum threads: 133
» Forum posts: 482

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 8 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 6 Guest(s)
Bing, Google

Latest Threads
Fred Writes the Unspeakab...
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
7 hours ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 21
PJW on Gillette
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
Yesterday, 04:11 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 8
Muslim Holidays
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: j.p.
01-17-2019, 11:13 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 19
Retoxify Masculinity
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 07:38 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 11
Gillette's Pink Tax is Se...
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 05:29 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 11
Walls of the World
Forum: World View
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 05:02 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 38
Manly women offer safe sp...
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 04:58 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 24
Here's Some Toxic Masculi...
Forum: Local Chatter
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 04:55 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 15
Trump Grounds Pelosi
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 02:38 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 10
Let Trump pay for his own...
Forum: The Nation
Last Post: k.d.
01-17-2019, 02:04 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 14

  Fred Writes the Unspeakable
Posted by: k.d. - Yesterday, 05:10 PM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (8)

A storm, methinks, is just over the horizon: The genetics of intelligence, perhaps of behavior. Geneticists know that intelligence is largely genetic. They know better than to say so. But research advances rapidly. Laboratories close in on the responsible genes. Things like genomic-sequence correlation proceed apace. Within ten or fifteen years, I will guess, the genetics of IQ will be firmly established. If the results turn out as seems likely…then what? What does a pseudo-democracy do when clearly stratified by intellectual capacity?
The mainstream media seem to sense the danger. We see descriptions of genetics as “pseudoscience,” hear muttering about ”scientific racism” and eugenics and just like Hitler. This is the bleating of child minds. Genetics is absolutely mainstream science. Following the field requires some knowledge of biochemistry which requires some knowledge of organic chemistry which requires some knowledge of general chemistry and some knowledge of eighth-grade algebra. Since few, even among the bright, wield these credentials, the public can still be told that genetics is racism. This won’t last.
The growing panic surfaced in the recent stripping of honors from James Watson, co-discoverer of the DNA helix. His sin? He said that the measured gap in intelligence between blacks and whites is genetic. For this he was silenced. It is science by fiat, Lysenkoism.
The hostility to genetics springs entirely from the fear that Mr. Watson will be proved right–that it will show blacks to be less intelligent than whites. Of course the politically correct don’t really believe in the intellectual equality of the races. If they did, they would welcome genetic research as a way of establishing the equality. You do not fear investigation unless you suspect it will give the wrong answer.
A similar though smaller gap is suspected between whites and Latinos. For this there is evidence,and counter-evidence. A gap seems to exist between whites and various Asians. We shall see. But the black-white gap is the bombshell. Here the evidence is overwhelming, and there is no counter-evidence. Thus the furious repression.
That intelligence is genetic should be obvious regardless of technical knowledge. Any dog breeder will tell you that Border Collies are brighter than beagles, that if you mate smarter dogs to smarter dogs, within a few generations you will have a strain of smarter dogs. If intelligence were cultural as we are obliged to say, almost on pain of death, all the children who grew up in Isaac Newton’s neighborhood would have been towering mathematical geniuses. Were they?
A dread question: Is it not now obvious, has it not been obvious for a very long time, that blacks cannot function in a technological society? A few, yes. Most, no. This is the case worldwide. Low intelligence, perhaps accompanied by poor impulse control, explains well the urban chaos, the crime, the poverty.
We are accustomed now to the intractable gap between blacks and whites. The gap appears on all tests of cognitive capacity and academic achievement: all of the IQ tests, the SATs, GREs, MCATs, LSATs, ACT, National Merit, AFQT, and others. This is so predictable as to make the value of pi seem capricious . The politically correct attribute the disparity to racism, institutional racism, unconscious racism, structural racism, poor self-esteem, white privilege, slavery, colonialism, culture, environment, and different learning styles. Do we really believe this?
Yearly the horrible news pours from the schools. The results of Maryland’s state test of academic achievement are typical. In 2017 in Baltimore there were thirteen high schools in which not a single student tested proficient in math. Customarily this is blamed on poor schools, but every aspect of the Baltimore system, from the mayor to the students is controlled by blacks, and the per-student expenditure is high. Similar results from other cities–Detroit, Chicago–are common, normal, expected.
A question no one asks, at least not out loud: To what extent are blacks dependent on the charity of whites? What would happen if all public assistance, all programs specifically or de facto for blacks were withdrawn?
Without affirmative action, racial quotas formal and informal, blacks would almost disappear from universities and the white-collar world. I think we all know this, but most recoil from the implications. I don’t blame them.
I am not sure that we all understand the extent of the affirmative programs and the distortions they cause for society. For example, on exams for promotion in police departments, by a large margin the top scorers are white so that, if departments advanced the most qualified, blacks would almost disappear. The same pattern exists for any job requiring intelligence. This can easily be confirmed.
What would happen if Section Eight housing were abandoned, Head Start, AFDC, free lunch and breakfasts in inner-city schools, food stamps, and all the rest? I do not recommend doing this–the consequences would be hideous–but do suggest thinking about it. The conclusion will probably be that blacks are in custodial care. If this is not true, tell me why it is not.
Look, without averting your gaze, at our many cities in catastrophic and apparently irremediable racial dysfunction. Look at Boston, Newark, Camden, Trenton, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Milwaukee, New Orleans, St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Oakland. These are the center of mass of black America, not the polished talking heads of the networks. These regions are huge, necrotic, barely touched by white civilization except through television. In eight hours of driving through them, you will never see a white face. The culture is not ours, the language, notions of civility. Another world. It doesn’t change. Apparently it can’t change.
The costs for America are high. Blacks, unable to compete, angry, hopeless, demand this, demand that. Streets must be renamed, statues torn down. . Attacks on whites continue, often brutal, always hidden by the media. Academic standards must be repudiated for them. Our cities become Haiti. In Chicago young blacks kill seven hundred of each other, in Baltimore three hundred. American culture coarsens under the angry grunting of rap. Now blacks demand the rewriting of our history.
The cultural degradation imposed to disguise inadequacy beggars belief. In a recent example among hundreds that could be adduced, American University will no longer grade the quality of writing. A brief quote will suffice:
“This plenary will argue against the use of conventional standards in college courses that grade student writing by single standards. Inoue will discuss the ways that White language supremacy is perpetuated in college classrooms despite the better intentions of faculty, particularly through the practices of grading writing.”
Detwaddled, this means that since literacy cannot be expected of blacks, it cannot be required of whites. Of course blacks can learn normal English, at least if raised in it. Mexican blacks speak normal Spanish. Learning a language as adults is cognitively much more difficult. Demanding it of them would be racism. Recognizing the impossibility of raising blacks to white (or Japanese, or Chinese, or Indian) levels, AU will pull whites down.
Since at least the time of classical Athens, the civilized have known that the ability to write clearly, speak clearly, and think clearly are the same thing. In Ebonics, how do you say, “The entropy of a closed system tends to remain the same or to increase” “Dat be, like, you know, man, know what I’m sayin’?”
What is to be done? The policies usual in countries of the First World do not work. As a white man my inclination is to favor color-blindness, equality of opportunity, and advancement by merit. If East Asian kids outperform white kids academically by a wide margin, which they do, then they should get into Harvard and the white kids should not. Neurosurgeons should be chosen by competence and nothing else. Affirmative action lowers standards for society as a whole, sometimes dangerously.
All true, but….Realistically, meritocracy works well only in a monochrome population. If I, white, fail to get into CalTech in astrophysics, I will be disappointed but will not complain of unfair discrimination. I just wasn’t smart enough. But it is very different when a race in its entirety fails to gain entrance. It creates a de facto partitioning of society. In today’s America, merit isn’t going to work.
More is involved than a lack of black biochemists. Differences in intelligence cause differences in culture. Bright populations will favor classical music, literature, history, the sciences, art. Dimmer peoples will not. Look for bookstores in their neighborhoods. Making things worse is the lack of commonality between black and white civilizations. We may reasonably ask why blacks should be interested things we teach in our schools. Our European heritage goes back at least as far as the Sumeria of the mid-Fourth Millennium BC, through Greece and Rome and Augustine and Aquinas, through the Renaissance, Magna Carta, all the myriad of European thinkers and poets through the Industrial Revolution to Mars landers. None of this is the heritage of blacks. Why would they care, or understand why we care? We are utterly different peoples.
.What do we do if –when–genetics makes the obvious undeniable? What then?

Print this item

  PJW on Gillette
Posted by: k.d. - Yesterday, 04:11 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

The ongoing war with Leftist/Progressive bullshit is becoming an eternal and full time project.

Print this item

  Retoxify Masculinity
Posted by: k.d. - 01-17-2019, 07:38 PM - Forum: World View - No Replies

Let’s be clear: My pronouns are “he,” “his,” and “stop being creepy weirdos.”
Okay, maybe the last one isn’t a pronoun, but then again, I’m a man and if I want an insulting string of words directed at the nattering nabobs of gender neutrality to be a pronoun, it is a pronoun. And if you don’t like it, fight me.
We need more masculinity, and the more toxic the social justice warriors think it is, the better.
Bizarrely, now shaving companies are allying with the SJWs in an Axis of Irritants. Gillette is channeling campus gender studies dorks to try to sell you razors. They all think you should soften up, get in touch with your feelings, and submit. 
I say tighten up, let your righteous fury flow through you, and tell them all to kiss your Schumer.
Much as I advocate global warming, I am a strong proponent of toxic masculinity. It’s also known as “masculinity.”
These are the qualities the SJWs want to wring out of us. Why? Because these are the qualities they cannot overcome. They want us weak, passive and obedient. That’s how they get power. Some bloated Trigglypuff screaming about the male gaze can’t force us to do anything. Sure, a lot of them have weight on us, but if we laugh at them and simply say “No” to their demands, they’re stuck. Are they going to go get a rifle and make us?
Nope. They have to talk us into surrendering, or really, pester us into surrendering. Which means talking us out of the uppity, aggressive, no-damns-given masculinity that is the last obstacle to their fussy, naggy domination.
Don’t be fooled by the “toxic” qualifier – all masculinity is toxic to these human weebles. What they call “toxic” is really the essence of freedom. It’s toxic all right, but to their goals, not ours. Masculinity means freedom from them and the puffy, non-binary utopia they dreamed up because that’s the only world in which such losers could be anything more than a sorry punchline.
It’s a War on Testosterone, and we’re culturally surrounded. But that’s awesome. As Toxic Male Icon and Army hero, General [url=https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/8182533.Anthony_McAuliffe]Anthony McAuliffe
of the 101st Airborne put it at Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge, “Men, we are surrounded by the enemy. We have the greatest opportunity ever presented an army. We can attack in any direction.” And Marine legend and Toxic Male “Chesty” Puller said something similar: “We're surrounded. That simplifies our problem of getting to these people and killing them." By the way, General Anthony McAuliffe, when the krauts demanded he surrender, responded, aptly, “Nuts!”

Now, if that last paragraph is incomprehensible to you, your masculinity is in a dire state and you need some re-toxification stat. Grab some non-craft beer, some ribs, and go watch Where Eagles Dare on Netflix. After that emergency treatment, find a man who with whom to go shoot guns and speak of brave deeds done in the face of America’s enemies. This will begin your recovery.
Am I saying men and women are different? Yes. Of course, so do the SJWs. They just want to eliminate those differences because those differences are an obstacle to their power. Embrace who you are, man or woman. Men and women are complimentary, the weaknesses of each compensated for by the strengths of the other. 
Being a man does not mean being a sad, hairy, lumpy version of a women. Nor does being a woman mean being a smaller, baby-having man. Being your gender is part of who you are, and by erasing that they seek to change you from who you are into who they want you to be: A neutered drone.
And “toxic femininity” is next on their target list.

The answer to the attack on toxic masculinity is to recommit to what they label “toxicity,” because what they call “toxic masculinity” is not about criminality or being a jerk. It’s about the basic premise of being a man, the role of builder and destroyer, engineer and warrior. They want to take what makes you special from you, so all you have are the scraps they choose to give you. And then they will own you.
Do you want to be owned? 
Cue the SJWs liars to hop in to say that praising masculinity means celebrating rape and abuse and mindless criminality and mayhem. But everything leftists say is a lie, and so is this. The answer to rape and abuse and mindless criminality and mayhem is, of course, more masculinity – the confrontation of evil, and its destruction, by righteous force. And righteous force is a masculine notion.
When some thug who didn’t get the memo about hugging is breaking down the door to get you, do you want some neckbeard sissy with a disposable Gillette standing by your side, or a toxic male with a 12-gauge Mossberg loaded with buckshot racking in a shell?

See, the vast majority of the world does not have the time or inclination for this kind of frivolous campus pap. The real world is hard and ugly, not the soft, safe and secure urban zone cleared and protected by the toxic males (and females – there are gloriously toxically masculine women too) in uniform that these SJWs despise. Toxic masculinity created a safe space here in the west where fundamentally silly people can freely express these ridiculous notions. But out there, there are real monsters, not mere childish boogeymen like “manspreaders.” And the only thing that keeps them at bay are those infused with toxic masculinity (some of them women) with bayonets.
I talk a lot about a world where men give up on being men in my latest novel, Wildfire (and the earlier People’s Republic and Indian Country), which detail a blue America bereft of freedom in large part because it is bereft of masculinity. 
Don’t let it happen.
Buy guns.
Drink beer.
And tell the SJWs to go to hell.

Print this item

  Gillette's Pink Tax is Sexist
Posted by: k.d. - 01-17-2019, 05:29 PM - Forum: Local Chatter - No Replies


Print this item

  Trump Grounds Pelosi
Posted by: k.d. - 01-17-2019, 02:38 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

[Image: 2019-01-17_11-23-14.jpg?itok=811Y4cQO]

Print this item

  Muslim Holidays
Posted by: k.d. - 01-17-2019, 02:30 PM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (1)

Motherfuckers as Tlaib would say.

Trump was asked about this and his response was, "HELL NO."

Print this item

  Here's Some Toxic Masculinity
Posted by: k.d. - 01-17-2019, 02:23 PM - Forum: Local Chatter - Replies (2)

Which is a good thing.

Print this item

  Let Trump pay for his own campaign speech
Posted by: j.p. - 01-17-2019, 11:06 AM - Forum: The Nation - Replies (1)

And take it to a safe space in Alabama.

Makes sense to me that Pelosi might effectively cancel or postpone Trump's State of the MAGAstate speech before congress.

I think the very sad marginalized manly men might be on to something. Pelosi is growing bigger balls than them, must the Gillete commercial ?

Print this item

  Manly women offer safe space
Posted by: j.p. - 01-17-2019, 10:47 AM - Forum: Local Chatter - Replies (3)

For sad "marginalized" manly men.

Tammy Bruce: It's time to stand up and stop this pathological frenzy to marginalize boys and men

[Image: tammy-bruce-headshot.jpg?ve=1&tl=1]
 By Tammy Bruce | The Washington Times

James Woods is particularly feeling blue today

Actor James Woods tweeted a sentiment that reflects the overwhelming reaction on social media: “So nice to see @Gillette jumping on the ‘men are horrible’ campaign permeating mainstream media and Hollywood entertainment. I for one will never use your product again.”

Print this item

  Trump-Gabbard 2020?
Posted by: k.d. - 01-16-2019, 09:00 PM - Forum: The Nation - No Replies

Writes Mike Holmes:
After viewing the LRC Blog clip from Tucker Carlson’s show with Glenn Greenwald about the DNC smearbund attack on Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), it occurs to me that a “fusion” ticket with Trump and Gabbard in 2020 might just be the answer.
Right and left populists, both of whom are gut level anti-US Empire and anti -corporatist. They even have many of the same political enemies. And what has the GOP done for Trump lately besides stab him in the back?
Sure, neither are libertarians, but who prominent in politics is? It would hit the Dems where it hurts the most, with women and Bernie progressives. Plus it would replace deadwood Pence with someone halfway decent. Win-win!

Print this item