The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/printthread.php 16 require_once
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Green Bay Forum
Happy Birthday - Printable Version

+- Green Bay Forum (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf)
+-- Forum: Lets Talk (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Local Chatter (http://www.greenbayweathercam.com/gbf/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Happy Birthday (/showthread.php?tid=2079)

Pages: 1 2 3

Happy Birthday - k.d. - 06-23-2021

to the exceedingly loyal Constitutionalist Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas.

RE: Happy Birthday - j.p. - 06-23-2021

That makes no sense.

Constitutionalism is required of all justices. It is referenced in every decision and opinion. So, they are all "loyal" to the Constitution.

RE: Happy Birthday - k.d. - 06-23-2021

If that were the case, every decision would be 9-0.

RE: Happy Birthday - j.p. - 06-23-2021

It would be nice.

But the Constitution is a relatively small simple document, purposefully. It is used to govern 350M people who have complex issues.

Plus we have republicans and democrats on the court. You could say that Thomas is "loyal" to one of those.

RE: Happy Birthday - k.d. - 06-23-2021

I say Thomas is loyal to the Constitution and its original meaning.

RE: Happy Birthday - j.p. - 06-24-2021

(06-23-2021, 06:22 PM)k.d. Wrote: I say Thomas is loyal to the Constitution and its original meaning.
How timely !

Supreme Court Rules for High-School Cheerleader Brandi Levy in Free-Speech Case Over Snapchat Post - WSJ

RE: Happy Birthday - k.d. - 06-24-2021

Have you read the dissenting opinion?

RE: Happy Birthday - j.p. - 06-24-2021

I did

RE: Happy Birthday - k.d. - 06-24-2021

You;re funny. You don't believe a school has the duty and obligation to discipline a kid's bad behavior yet it is alright to censor speech of doctors, scientists, and researchers who disagree with the fraud Fauxchi. Seriously, you are a joke.

RE: Happy Birthday - j.p. - 06-24-2021

First of all there was no originalism in Thomas' dissent.

The notion that the "loco parentis doctrine" applies to someone who was firmly in the custody her parents is the joke. Not a single justice or lessor court agree with that.

I seriously don't think Thomas is against the first amendment, he was just appeasing his puritan buddies.

No doctors were censored, real gov't censorship is illegal.