The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No Denying Trump
#1
is the duly elected president. The evidence piling up makes it indisputable.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#2
He will be until at least Jan 20. I think he will afterwards as well.

I have not heard anything about any widespread improprieties. It's unnecessarily chaotic, but so far legit.

His jaw dropping "campaign" speech this evening was nothing.
Reply
#3
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11...der-video/

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-...ing-states

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11...ead-night/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh5U_6apzvI

https://summit.news/2020/11/05/trump-sup...years-old/

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/pre...den-surge/

Not even the tip of the tip of the iceberg.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#4
(11-05-2020, 09:35 PM)k.d. Wrote: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11...der-video/

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-...ing-states

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11...ead-night/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh5U_6apzvI

https://summit.news/2020/11/05/trump-sup...years-old/

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/pre...den-surge/

Not even the tip of the tip of the iceberg.
These guys can't keep up with Trump. With the excepting of the first one, these are all hearsay and simple anomalies. Your first one was a half truth.
Reply
#5
https://www.unz.com/proberts/evidence-mo...-election/

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/inter...ting-dead/

https://noqreport.com/2020/11/02/democra...ts-report/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9_SgYJnbKo
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#6
Pretty much all a regurgitation of the same post
A bit wacked. I think we need to do much better if there is a chance
Reply
#7
From here
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/correia-fkery-afoot

Yesterday there was a meme going around about how Wisconsin had something like 90% voter turnout, and how this was 20 points higher than usual, and it how it would also be one of the highest voter turnouts in all of American history. If Wisconsin was at 90% that beats the highest national number in all of American history by EIGHT points. And that was 1876 (which was legendarily fraudulent by the way).

Except, this is the problem with using memes to make your argument, it was only partially accurate, and the previous Wisconsin numbers were cited one way, and the current year was calculated a different way. (don’t feel bad, I fell for that one too, and as an accountant, that’s SO ANNOYING). When most people think of voter turnout, they think what percent of registered voters vote. But because Wisconsin has same day voting (a gift for fraudsters) their prior year percentages were votes compared to eligible population (that’s so goofy). But it meant the meme was comparing apples to oranges. So the leftists immediately jumped on that error to dismiss the idea that there was anything weird about how many people turned out to vote this time.
HOWEVER, that’s useless obfuscation. Because if you calculate the number the same way that most Americans do, their turn out was still like 90%, which is a rate normally reserved for dictators (that combined with the vote ratios would have made Saddam Hussein blush). I had one liberal guy point out that notoriously corrupt Seattle also gets 90%… which doesn’t exactly help his case.
Because here’s the kicker, the high turn out is the average for the state, but when you drill down on the source of these statistically improbable blue vote dumps, they’ve got districts with TWO HUNDRED PERCENT TURN OUT. That’s over 200%. There’s 7 over 100%, and a ton of them in the 90s. 
Now the quick liberal dismiss explanation for this is that Wisconsin has same day registration (again, a fraudsters dream) and thousands of people ignored months of TV and social media beating them over the head to get registered to vote, and just decided to do it at the last minute because Biden is just that awesome/Trump is just that bad.
Except if you’re an auditor, when you see super suspicious spikes like that in certain places, the first thing we think is that’s the place where you’ve got somebody over the controls colluding. So that’s where you go to fabricate your bullshit.
200% turn out is fucking insane. Same day voting or not. That’s madness. When I was looking into this stuff I pulled a HuffPo article about the 2012 election and how it was controversial that some Madison ward had gotten 119% turnout.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#8
Hearsay and anomaly is not evidence. Besides Wisconsin was a virtual tie. So Trump was in on this action ?

Here's a little arithmetic

https://www.13newsnow.com/article/news/v...22496c3314

From ZH:
"If Wisconsin was at 90%"

If
Reply
#9
Nope, you can only go by registered voters, any others are illegal votes. It doesn't matter what the population is because it includes those who can't legally vote, just for example felons, crazies, oops, mentally ill, illegals and those here from other countries legally, but can't vote in our elections - just to name a few.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#10
We can use whatever method that makes us feel good. If you like the 90 percent then 90 percent is normal. That is what the fact check basically said. ZH was comparing apples to oranges. Imagine that.

Or just slightly higher

Did zh pull down that article? Or was your text not from zh ?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)