The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fails the Smell Test
#1
A compilation of twenty alleged election 'facts' that don't pass the smell test
By Andrea Widburg

Americans have common sense, so they can understand when they're being played (for example, when politicians place Americans under house arrest and then ignore their own rules to party and travel).  And they know there is no way on God's green earth that decrepit, demented, corrupt, and terminally stupid Joe Biden fairly won this election.  This post assembles various election anomalies that don't pass the smell test.
J.B. Shurk, who frequently publishes at American Thinker, wrote a knock-out article for The Federalist about Joe Biden's magical performance in the election.  You should read the whole article, but here are four things that don't pass the smell test:
1. Biden allegedly got 80 million votes, which is more than Obama received at his peak, in 2008 — and Biden did this despite losing minority voters to Donald Trump and trailing Trump in voter enthusiasm.
2. Biden broke 60 years of precedent by winning nationally despite losing prodigiously in bellwether states and counties.  The last time this happened was when the mafia got out the vote for John F. Kennedy in 1960.
3. Trump had extraordinary coattails, so much so that even the New York Times admitted that the "Democrats Suffered Crushing Down-Ballot Losses Across America."  Think about that: Biden had no coattails and no enthusiasm, yet he allegedly won a record number of votes.  Smells fetid to me.
4. Biden barely made it through the primaries, while Trump soared, with Trump's performance being a historically sure sign of voter enthusiasm and probable victory — yet Biden, again, allegedly scored an equally historically strong victory.
At The Spectator, Patrick Basham, a professional pollster, also felt that Biden's alleged win cannot pass the smell test.  Again, this is a summary, so you should read the original article:
5. Trump exceeded his original vote count by the largest margin for any incumbent in American history.  He got 10 million more votes than before; by contrast, Obama, in 2012, got 3.5 million fewer votes than in 2008.
6. Trump's support among blacks grew by 50%, while Biden's fell below the important 90% mark that Democrat candidates need to secure victory.
7. In the Rust Belt, Biden lost black support everywhere except in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee.  In those cities, every single black person apparently voted for Biden.
8. While pollsters can and do manipulate polling outcomes, non-polling metrics (historical norms such as the economy, enthusiasm, etc.) have never been wrong — only we're being told that this year was the exception.
Then there are the indicia of fraud that Dr. Navid Kershavarz-Nia detailed:
9. The fact that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia simultaneously pretended to halt ballot-counting while continuing to count is evidence of election fraud collusion.
10. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
11. The scanners were almost certainly programmed to fail to keep audit records.
12. In the contested states, the voting machines were alleged to have processed hundreds of thousands of ballots within a short time, which is a physical impossibility.
And here are a few more indications of fraud:
13. In Pennsylvania, statistically impossible numbers of late-arriving mail-in votes went to Biden.
14. Dominion and ES&S voting machines were created to have back doors and specific functions to manipulate votes either at the machine or over the internet.
15. Fox News's behavior on election night (refusing to call pro-Trump outcomes while prematurely calling Arizona for Biden) was so abnormal that Vegas oddsmakers instantly assumed that the fix was in.
16. The allegedly late-arriving mailed in ballots increased Biden's equally alleged lead with statistically impossible perfection and stability.
17. There were anomalies in Virginia that suggested that computers were subtracting votes from Trump and, sometimes, giving them to Biden.
18. One analysis shows that voting machines in Michigan systematically removed votes from Trump and handed them to Biden.  I saw a rebuttal (which I cannot locate now) that purported to debunk this but did so by using a different scale on the X-axis, which I found inherently suspicious.
19. Over 100,000 Pennsylvania absentee ballots were returned a day after they were mailed out, on the day they were mailed out, or on the day before they were mailed out.
20. In all the contested areas, and at Dominion's website, Democrats have been systematically failing to create or have destroyed all data that could be used to demonstrate fraud.  This creates the legal presumption that the data do, in fact, show fraud.
On behalf of all Trump voters, I say to the Democrats who are trying to gaslight us: don't spit in my face and tell me it's raining.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#2
Facts are your friend. Get some and go see a judge. So far none.

The only new thing here is now Fox is now part of the conspiracy LOL

BTW "facts" can't be "alleged" as you bright young reporter stated :

"A compilation of twenty alleged election 'facts' that don't pass the smell test
By Andrea Widburg"


BTW facts can't "alleged" as your bright young reporter stated
Reply
#3
Pick the ones that are not facts. I couldn't find any.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#4
4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,16,17,18,20
Reply
#5
Now dispute them with your own facts.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#6
(11-30-2020, 11:10 PM)k.d. Wrote: Now dispute them with your own facts.
The burden is on the accuser. When you state something as "fact" you need to back it up.
Reply
#7
Quote:The burden is on the accuser.
You are the accuser saying they are not facts.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#8
(12-01-2020, 09:26 AM)k.d. Wrote:
Quote:The burden is on the accuser.
You are the accuser saying they are not facts.
That makes no sense.

When somebody says they farted the star spangled banner in the key of C. He might have , but must we accept that as fact if we didn't hear it ?
Reply
#9
So if a tree falls in the woods and you don't hear it, does that mean it didn't make a sound?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#10
(12-01-2020, 10:10 AM)k.d. Wrote: So if a tree falls in the woods and you don't hear it, does that mean it didn't make a sound?
That would never be contested, thus we would be spared the nonsense.

And the other hand, crazy pronouncements and the claiming of musical farting allegros would need substantiation.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)