Give it up Mr President

[j.p.]

Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation's (nypost.com)

Mr. President, it’s time to end this dark charade.
We’re one week away from an enormously important moment for the next four years of our country.
On Jan. 5, two runoff races in Georgia will determine which party will control the Senate — whether Joe Biden will have a rubber stamp or a much-needed check on his agenda.
Unfortunately, you’re obsessed with the next day, Jan. 6, when Congress will, in a pro forma action, certify the Electoral College vote. You have tweeted that, as long as Republicans have “courage,” they can overturn the results and give you four more years in office.
In other words, you’re cheering for an undemocratic coup.

We understand, Mr. President, that you’re angry that you lost. But to continue down this road is ruinous. We offer this as a newspaper that endorsed you, that supported you: If you want to cement your influence, even set the stage for a future return, you must channel your fury into something more productive.

You had every right to investigate the election. But let’s be clear: Those efforts have found nothing. To take just two examples: Your campaign paid $3 million for a recount in two Wisconsin counties, and you lost by 87 more votes. Georgia did two recounts of the state, each time affirming Biden’s win. These ballots were counted by hand, which alone debunks the claims of a Venezuelan vote-manipulating Kraken conspiracy.
Sidney Powell is a crazy person. Michael Flynn suggesting martial law is tantamount to treason. It is shameful.

[k.d.]

Cheering the Deep State and their black-robed conspirators, eh?

[j.p.]

Nope. Cheering the constitution and the processes our founders set forth.

[k.d.]

To the best of my knowledge the legal options are still going on.
If you were actually cheering the Constitution you would be damning the SCOTUS for not taking the Texas case of which they have original obligation.

[j.p.]

I don't have a problem with the legal actions.
Texas needs to worry about Texas. That was the SCOTUS determination.

If the ridiculous "dilution" argument held water. The suit had to be made against all of the states. And then voter suppression would need to come into play.

[k.d.]

Original Jurisdiction. Look it up. Prove me wrong or STFU.

[j.p.]

That has nothing to do with anything here.

[k.d.]

Cheering the constitution and the processes our founders set forth.

Article II

Article II Annotated

Section 1

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, 

Start cheering.

[j.p.]

Doesn't say they can ignore the will of the people.

[k.d.]

Doesn't say they can ignore the will of the people.

No, it says they can't ignore the legislature.