Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Without hearing any evidence they were able to co-conspire to keep the steal alive. They have lost all credibility.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
There was no evidence to hear. Thus the dismissal.
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Nope, again, technicalities with no evidence presented.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
03-08-2021, 05:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2021, 05:40 PM by j.p..)
Motions are filed indicating evidence that will be presented
One reason cases are refused is the high probability of failure
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Quote:One reason cases are refused is the high probability of failure
Source
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
HMMMMM! So why hear any cases if they are pre-determined?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
That's adorable.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire