STUPID, STUPID, STUPID

[k.d.]

Did we really need a duplicate of what was already posted confirming what I said.?

[j.p.]

You didn't say anything close. You implied strongly that this was the result of a Moderna jab. That was not even remotely the subject.

[k.d.]

This was my original post that got your undies-in-a-bundle. I said nothing, I merely posted an article and you keep taking it into some other dimension. Deal with what it said.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that vaccine makers and U.S. healthcare officials are now attempting to find out why the mRNA vaccines are creating adverse events and heart conditions in healthy people.  Call me crazy, but studying dangerous side-effects would seem to be a more prudent line of inquiry before injecting people, not after.

Wall Street Journal – […] Researchers aren’t certain why the messenger RNA vaccines, one from Pfizer Inc. and partner BioNTech, and the other from Moderna Inc., are likely causing the inflammatory heart conditions myocarditis and pericarditis in a small number of cases.

Some theories center on the type of spike protein that a person makes in response to the mRNA vaccines. The mRNA itself or other components of the vaccines, researchers say, could also be setting off certain inflammatory responses in some people.  One new theory under examination: improper injections of the vaccine directly into a vein, which sends the vaccine to heart muscle.


To find answers, some doctors and scientists are running tests in lab dishes and examining heart-tissue samples from people who developed myocarditis or pericarditis after getting vaccinated. (read more)

Meanwhile, the rush to vaccinate children, with an untested vaccine as a treatment to protect against a virus that poses no significant threat, is continuing.

[j.p.]

I was responding to the other garbage.

I said later it is good to wonder why people have heart problems.

[k.d.]

The only garbage is in your unthinking because you are incapable of comprehension of reading an article.

[j.p.]

You were as usual all over the map.

The WSJ article was sensical

The Summit ( and it's clones) article was typical conspiracy crap.

[k.d.]

Like I said, no comprehension.

[j.p.]

I read your sources, such as they are. I posted the German newspaper. You want no part of it. You only want the edited portion. You need someone to tell you how to think.

It's a pattern in everything you post.

[k.d.]

I posted the German newspaper.

I don't read or write German so that was useless to me.

You need someone to tell you how to think.

Why is everything you write directly from Nancy Pelosi's 'talking points'.

[j.p.]

There is a button for English.

Never in my life have I used Pelosi as a source.