Pfizer Jab Causes AIDS

[k.d.]

So you post lies from Frauddci, CDC, WHO, Mediaite, CNN, MSNBC and that guy in NC living in his mommy's basement

[j.p.]

You post from the CDC and WHO more than I do.

You , or should I say your masters, use their data when it suits theirs/yours narrative. I don't know anybody from NC.

[k.d.]

This is the dipshit ankle-biter you are constantly posting who has no credentials of any sort

Mr Dave Van Zandt

Media Bias/Fact Check

(mediabiasfactcheck.com)

Greensboro, NC

Editor@Mediabiasfactcheck.com

Dear Mr Dave Van Zandt,

Re: Notice to Cease & Desist Libelous Conduct

Please accept this communication as a Cease and Desist Notice prior to legal action under 28 U.S. Code § 4101(1).

It has been drawn to our attention that your business, MEDIA BIAS FACT CHECK is libeling our business, Principia Scientific International(PSI) by posting the following (recorded on March 13, 2020)

On your site at:  https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/methodology/  you state:

“Conspiracy/Pseudoscience

The Conspiracy/Pseudoscience designation is reserved for sources that publish unverifiable information that relates to known conspiracies such as the New World Order, Illuminati, False Flags, Aliens, etc. Pseudoscience is determined by publishing unverified health and scientific claims. In order to be classified in this group the central theme of the source must revolve around conspiracies or pseudoscience.”

On the same webpage you add the following disclaimer:

“Disclaimer: The methodology used by Media Bias Fact Check is our own.  It is not a tested scientific method.  It is meant as a simple guide for people to get an idea of a source’s bias.  Media Bias Fact Check will always review and change any factual errors when brought to our attention.  We make every effort to be as factual as possible.  Our goal is to have MBFC rated as least biased by our own criteria.”

According to Merriam-Webster online dictionary the term ‘pseudoscience’ is defined as:  “a system of theories, assumptions, and methods erroneously regarded as scientific.”

You thus taint our scientific organisation as unscientific – a palpable lie provable in a court of law.

It is our belief you have made the above published statement with intention of causing damage to the reputation of our legally regulated UK non-profit scientific association which is scrupulously regulated under law as a community interest company (CiC).

By law a CIC is prohibited from political bias i.e. it cannot advocate for any political point of view. To engage in such action would render us likely to be struck off the register or be prosecuted.

Contrary to the false impression you give your readers, we are an international body of 5,500+ members, many of whom are credentialed science professionals, engineers and STEM academics, including award-winning scientists, government experts, etc.

Our published work is not pseudoscience but premised on established scientific methods. A select list of some of our distinguished member is here: A Selection Of Member Biographies. [1]

In conclusion, not only do you admit your own methodology is unscientific, but because you also fail to cite which specific PSI posts are pseudoscience, you condemn all our members, which compounds your own bias.

As per 28 U.S. Code § 4101(1) we regard the words below civilly actionable and demand removal of them within 28 days:

“CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These […]”

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/?s=princi...ernational

If you persist in maintaining this false assertion against us to jeopardize our legal standing, I hereby require you to provide substantiation of your accusation. You may do so by providing us a selection of hyperlinks from published material on our website(s) which you claim are ‘conspiracy-pseudoscience.’

Such evidence may then be considered for submission to a court of law for adjudication of the veracity of your claims.

If you are unwilling/unable to provide us the evidence you rely on to make your claims then you are hereby required to remove your false statement.

[1] https://principia-scientific.com/why-psi...-as-a-cic/

I await your reply.

Sincerely,

John O’Sullivan  CEO

Principia Scientific International CIC (No: 10824140) Fully incorporated in the UK for charitable purposes. http://principia-scientific.org/

****

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.

---

CONGRATULATIONS! You have once again diverted a serious issue about Pfizer into a garbage thread with your stupid 'killing the messenger' bs.
I'm done playing your idiotic game and will not respond to anything that isn't relative to the thread. In other words play with yourself onanist.

[j.p.]

Pfizer vaccine doesn’t cause AIDS
Principia Scientific cease and desist order was not granted

[k.d.]

Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS): 'We should anticipate seeing this immune erosion more widely'

A Lancet study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people in Sweden was conducted among 1.6 million individuals over nine months. It showed that protection against symptomatic COVID-19 declined with time, such that by six months, some of the more vulnerable vaccinated groups were at greater risk than their unvaccinated peers.

Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness.


https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/new...re-widely/

[j.p.]

Not a single study showed that Pfizer causes AIDS. You should try reading your bullshit

[k.d.]

You should try reading your bullshit

You should try reading what the doctors in the article say.

[j.p.]

I did.

[k.d.]

Well, then you should have read this:
Doctors are calling this phenomena in the repeatedly vaccinated “immune erosion” or “acquired immune deficiency”, [AIDS] accounting for elevated incidence of myocarditis and other post-vaccine illnesses that either affect them more rapidly, resulting in death, or more slowly, resulting in chronic illness. IOT, acquired, meaning acquired post Jab; immune deficiency, meaning it weakens the immune system. There is nothing difficult to understand here.

[j.p.]

What doctors ? The Frontliners ? LOL