New exotic vacationland

[j.p.]

There were 2 sentences and 29 words between your bolded parses. The meaning changes dramatically.

You also mentioned the "global warming junk science". Point that out in the article.

[k.d.]

Then what exactly were you trying to say, if not in those sentences? Was there science? If so, why didn't you say what the science was? You clearly and unequivocally said there was no science written by 3 scientists. You can take no other meaning out of what you wrote.

[j.p.]

Then what exactly were you trying to say, if not in those sentences? Was there science? If so, why didn't you say what the science was? You clearly and unequivocally said there was no science written by 3 scientists. You can take no other meaning out of what you wrote.

My direct quote:

no mention of the science or causes behind global warming. 

Feel free to jumble the words to make it what you wanted me to say.

[k.d.]

Then what do 3 scientists have to do with it?