Those are my words ? Point it out
"It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.
We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).
The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.
Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?"
While you at it. Point out what you believe is a contradiction.
"It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.
We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).
The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.
Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?"
(02-12-2020, 11:47 AM)j.p. Wrote: Those are my words ? Point it out
"It was nice of you coming clean that you did not read the article because it was published by Wapo.
We know this because the article made absolutely no mention of the science or causes behind global warming as you claim. It was simply observations of temperature trends of mostly Antarctic. That's it, you can settle down a tad. Plus the article, through extensive quoting, was effectively written by 3 scientists (non Wapo employees).
The problem you have is that Wapo had the audacity to print it.
Just curious. Do you think thermometers are a hoax ?"
While you at it. Point out what you believe is a contradiction.