The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $unreadreports - Line: 32 - File: global.php(961) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/global.php(961) : eval()'d code 32 errorHandler->error_callback
/global.php 961 eval
/showthread.php 28 require_once




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNC Moves Goal Post... Again
#1
"...DNC has not released their official guidance for the March 15 debate in Phoenix, but it would be very obvious that they are trying to cancel Tulsi, who they’re scared of a third party run..."
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dnc-...-qualifies
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#2
I can't think of a single reason why the Dems would want Gabbard there. Can you ? Warren either for that matter.

It's Biden v Sanders now. Political parties are not, and have never been, legally tied to a set of rules.

Debates are not mouth pieces for fringe candidates. Tulsi is by definition a fringe candidate now. Her viability is less than zero.
Reply
#3
With that response it is plain that you are a devoted member of the Party of the ASS and support their corrupt machinations thru and thru.

What is fringe about Tulsi's policies? Besides, she is a woman, your party supposedly loves women; she is a woman of color, your party claims love of diversity; she is young, your party has railed against old, rich, white guys forever, yet they deny a woman of color a place on the stage with two old, rich white guys. You see no hypocrisy or shenanigans going on here?.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#4
Gabbard is part of the machine, her policies are mainstream. .05 of a percent support is a bit fringe-ish. wouldn't you say ?

So you think affirmative action should get a spot in the debate ? Maybe they should allow Williamson a podium, sure she'd love to be there.
Reply
#5
Quote:Gabbard is part of the machine
You must be living in an alternate universe. She has fought the DNC since the last election.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#6
She was against not being paid attention to. Her policies mirror Bernie.
Reply
#7
Quote:She was against not being paid attention to. Her policies mirror Bernie.
She wasn't a candidate in 2016, but she was vice-chair of the DNC and resigned over their moving goal posts.


The minute she met eligibility they changed it. Are you too blind to see what crooked, corrupt, power-seeking club you belong to?

Additionally, how is it, the DNC totally changed the requirements so that Bloomberg could debate? They are totally corrupt. And what did these assholes promise to Pete Buttplug, Beto, Klobuchar, Bloomberg and the rest to suddenly endorse Biden. You should be ashamed to be a part of that party.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#8
Yes . The party picks their own candidate. Not always democratically. I am ashamed of both parties.
Reply
#9
why keep defending them, then?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”

― Voltaire
Reply
#10
Just telling you how it is.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)