Morris Dees
https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/sto...164839002/

Writes Greg Privette:
Hi Lew,
I read the article linked from the Political Theater about the college admissions “scandal”. I have read a couple of other articles about this as well.
From the article:
‘We believe everyone charged here today had a role in fostering a culture of corruption and greed that created an uneven playing field for students trying to get into these schools the right way through hard work, good grades and community service,’ said John Bonavolonta, the FBI Special Agent in Charge.
I like the “uneven playing field” part rather than “the right way through hard work, etc.” I have also seen statements in some articles about it being wrong for these kids to get a spot that could have gone to someone more qualified. I have seen no mention however of the similarity of this and admissions based on affirmative action. Another case of when the state imposes advantages they are “fair” but when private people do it they are cheating.
I also loved this line:
Prosecutors said in court on Tuesday that some students also lied about their ethnicity on applications to take advantage of affirmative action.
I am sure no one can think of any other high profile person who lied about ethnicity on their college applications. One hint, that person turned out to be 1/1024th.

Who Should Run the Country?
Michael S. Rozeff

The singer Cher says it should be young non-white women. I guess that means the likes of Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashid Tlaib.
Cher said “Since the day our founding fathers signed the Declaration of Independence, our country has been run almost exclusively by old white men. Thankfully because of Nancy and other strong women, this is changing.”
Using Cher’s thought pattern, changing to what? To being run by old white women like Nancy? No, she didn’t say that. She refers only to “strong women”. Then why didn’t she say “run almost exclusively by men”? Or “strong men”?
She added in “old” and “white”. That’s strange. She’s old too. She’s 72. Her use of “white” is racial, but she’s white and Nancy is white.
Can we make sense of her use of “old white men”? Yes, if she means that she wants to see young, non-white women running the country.
But why that category? Merely because they are not old, not white and not men? Are their ideas and policies going to be determined by the fact that they are young, not white and female? That’s what Cher is implying. Why should someone who is a young non-white woman be better equipped to make political decisions than an old white man? If this were true, why have societies not discovered this before? Are we just now awakening to the superior leadership afforded by young non-white women?
Is Cher calling for free college education for the young, government programs and wealth transfers for the non-white and unlimited abortions for the female?
I’m old, white and male. I do not resent Cher’s comment, but I wonder about her character. I wouldn’t criticize her for being old, white and female. That would not be right. If I did that, I’d be criticizing all the elderly white women I’ve ever known, including my own mother; and they’ve been very good and helpful to me. Is Cher hostile toward old white men in general, or is she thinking about Trump, whom she hates?
Or is Cher hostile toward the powerful old white men who denied the rights of so many minorities in our history? That’s highly likely, in which case she’s on the wrong track. Young, non-white women with power will abuse it in their own ways as badly as have old white men in the past and present.
Ilhan Omar is quoted as saying Trump is not human. Is he then sub-human? That’s the rhetoric of those who engage in mass exterminations and genocides.
Cher’s thinking is not deep enough. Her enemy should not be old white men and she shouldn’t place her hopes on young non-white women. The problem of government and power isn’t solved or ameliorated by replacing people with these characteristics of age, race and sex by their opposites.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/tucker-carls...-a-eunuch/
And a few words about CNN and MSNBC and the rest of the left-wing media.

Carlson fired, jk. But that is my prediction. Lucky for Tuck, I'm not good at predictions.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-ca...0a0014c8a6

Last Thursday, House Democrats, freaked-out by the fact that a hijab-wearing Muslim upstart Congresswoman suggested that there exists a “political influence in this country that says it is OK to push for allegiance to a foreign country,” shoved an anti-“hate” resolution through the chamber by a 407-23 vote.
Keep in mind that this is the same House of Representatives that fewer than two months ago voted 424-1 to condemn “White nationalism and White supremacy as hateful.”

It’s official: Congress hates hate.
The text of the resolution contains eight instances of the words “hate,” “hateful,” and “hatred.” It features a whopping thirteen instances of either “anti-Semitism” or “anti-Semitic.” The word “white” crops up four times, but only in reference to those fundamentally evil “white nationalists” and “white supremacists” who stand in the way of progress and All Things Good. It managed to squeeze the Charlottesville debacle, the Charleston massacre, and the Pittsburgh synagogue attack into its text—even though these truly have nothing to do with the topic of whether “it is OK to push for allegiance to a foreign country”—as if the intent was to imply that all this “hate” is only coming from white males and can only come from them:

Quote:Whereas white supremacists in the United States have exploited and continue to exploit bigotry and weaponized hate for political gain, targeting traditionally persecuted peoples, including African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other people of color, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and others with verbal attacks, incitement, and violence….
Whereas anti-Semitism is the centuries-old bigotry and form of racism faced by Jewish people simply because they are Jews….
Whereas Jewish people are subject in the media and political campaigns to numerous other dangerous anti-Semitic myths as well, including that Jews control the United States Government or seek global, political, and financial domination and that Jews are obsessed with money….
“It’s official: Congress hates hate.”
Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives…rejects the perpetuation of anti-Semitic stereotypes in the United States and around the world, including the pernicious myth of dual loyalty and foreign allegiance, especially in the context of support for the United States-Israel alliance.

Quote:Anti-Semitism is a very special kind of hatred that should never be watered down. There has never been a persecution of a people like the Jewish people.

Quote:We are tremendously proud to be part of a body that has put forth a condemnation of all forms of bigotry including anti-Semitism, racism, and white supremacy.

Syria Notifies Israel It Will Attack If IDF Doesn't Leave Golan Heights
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-1...an-heights
"We will increase the numbers of residents in the Golan, sending a resounding message to all - we will never relinquish the Golan Heights," Gantz said, according to The Jerusalem Post. "We will enlist the support of the US and the international community to promote Israel's interests on our northern border," he added.

This could get very interesting.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-1...e-outbreak
US Quarantines Over 2,200 Migrants Amid "Unprecedented" Disease Outbreaks