Blaming their low vaccination rate.

Quote:MOSCOW (AP) — Dr. Georgy Arbolishvili doesn’t need to see government statistics or hear about the records being broken every day for infections and deaths to know that Russia is struggling through a particularly alarming phase of the coronavirus pandemic.

He simply looks around his filled-to-capacity intensive care unit at Moscow’s Hospital No. 52.

With only about a third of Russia’s 146 million people vaccinated against COVID-19, the country has hovered near 1,000 reported deaths per day for weeks and surpassed it on Saturday — a situation that Arbolishvili says “causes despair.”

“The majority of ICU patients in grave condition are unvaccinated,” he told The Associated Press. These illnesses “could have been very easily avoided if a person had been vaccinated.”

October 17, 2021
Nebraska AG's devastating critique of the suppression of effective COVID therapies
By Jarrad Winter
Legal opinions usually aren't terribly fun to read, but if you've been an ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine advocate for use against Wuhan Plague, this one definitely will bring you much joy.

It's a rather lengthy and full spectrum opinion issued by Doug Peterson, Nebraska's Attorney General, in response to a query from the state's Department of Health and Human Services as to whether physicians can be persecuted and tormented for prescribing ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to patients sick with the China Flu. What the AG's response amounts to is a full and complete takedown of the conspiracy to suppress cheap and effective early Covid-19 treatments.



All the players -- FDA, CDC, Fauci, Big Pharma, the media, all of them -- get a glorious and swift kick in the rear end. Portions of it even made me laugh out loud. As far as legal documents go, it's definitely easy reading and understandable to everyone. It seems clear that the AG's office went to some trouble to layout the whole saga in a way the masses can understand without translation by legal scholars.

What follows are some of the most relevant parts (at least in my sometimes-humble opinion), but it really is in everyone's best interest to personally read the opinion in full. People must individually understand what's actually happening for themselves. This is what will enable We The People to course correct and divert from the ruinous path set for us by the overlords.

As to the question of ivermectin as a treatment option:

The Mahmud study–a CRT that explored ivermectin as an early treatment for 363 individuals–concluded that “patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin plus doxycycline recovered earlier, were less likely to progress to more serious disease, and were more likely to be COVID-19 negative on day 14. And Niaee’s research team found that ivermectin can help even hospitalized patients. That group conducted a “randomized, double-

blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial” with 180 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. They concluded that ivermectin “reduces the rate of mortality and duration of hospitalization in adult COVID-19 patients,” and the improvement of other clinical parameters showed that the ivermectin, with a wide margin of safety, had a high therapeutic effect on COVID-19.

What initially made ivermectin a target for all the inexplicable slander?

Why would ivermectin’s original patent holder go out of its way to question this medicine by creating the impression that it might not be safe? There are at least two plausible reasons. First, ivermectin is no longer under patent, so Merck does not profit from it anymore. That likely explains why Merck declined to “conduct clinical trials” on ivermectin and COVID-19 when given the chance. Second, Merck has a significant financial interest in the medical profession rejecting ivermectin as an early treatment for COVID-19.

As to the question of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment option:

In 2004, long before the COVID-19 pandemic began, a lab study revealed that chloroquine "is an effective inhibitor of the replication of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in vitro" and thus that it should be "considered for immediate use in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV infections". The following year, another paper explained that "chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV" and "is effective in preventing the spread of SARS[-]CoV in cell culture."

It is widely recognized in the medical community that hydroxychloroquine is generally safe, so safe in fact that it may be prescribed to pregnant women and "children of all ages."

What made hydroxychloroquine controversial in the first place?

A striking example features one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals–the Lancet. In the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Lancet published a paper denouncing hydroxychloroquine as dangerous. Yet the reported statistics were so flawed that journalists and outside researchers immediately began raising concerns. Then after one of the authors refused to provide the analyzed data, the paper was retracted, but not before many countries stopped using hydroxychloroquine and trials were cancelled or interrupted. The Lancet’s own editor in chief admitted that the paper was a “fabrication, a monumental fraud,” and “a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency."

Interesting note about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine hesitancy:

As for professional associations' and physician groups' views on hydroxychloroquine, it appears they generally adopt the same position they did on ivermectin. Those like the AAPS who support ivermectin as an option for early COVID-19 treatment generally support hydroxychloroquine too, while those like the AMA, APhA, and ASHP that oppose one typically resist the other.

The AG's conclusion:

Allowing physicians to consider these early treatments will free them to evaluate additional tools that could save lives, keep patients out of the hospital, and provide relief for our already strained healthcare system.

Ireland: Two Counties With 99.7% And 98%+ ‘Fully Vaccinated’ See Massive Covid ‘Outbreaks’
https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/irelan...reaks.html

Antibody dependent enhancement: Unavoidable problems in vaccine development
Look into it.

The Proud Boys Complain About Being Single and I Wonder Why (themarysue.com)

Quote:HEY LAAAAAAAAAAAAADIES! Are you single and ready to mingle? Do you like your men misogynistic, homophobic, and fascist? Are you looking to live out your Donna Reed fantasy in some dude’s mom’s basement? Then good news! The Proud Boys are on the hunt for their future wives!

At a “Fall Love Fest” rally in Los Angeles this past weekend, a pack of Proud Boys took a break from chanting “F-ck Antifa!” to let the sparse crowd know that many of them are single and “looking for housewives.” It’s amazing that these gents are single. You mean no woman has signed up for a lifetime of cooking, cleaning, and providing sex for these red-pilled cult members? Color us shocked.

I learned something today from this forum ! Might be the first time.

Did not know that "Brown Sugar" from the Stones was actually slated to be "Black Pussy". I'll be damned

After a little looking around I found out that I really didn't even know the lyrics. The Rolling Stones were not one of my favorite bands and Brown Sugar was one of their worst songs, but I paid attention to things like that back in the day. I owned the album it was on.

Just goes to show you the old axiom that lyrics really aren't that important to Rock and Roll is true.


Speaking of the Rolling Stones. I thought Paul McCartney's recent comment about the Stones being a "blues cover band" to be somewhat true, At least compared to the Beatles.

Colin Powell

Jim Goad
Rolling Stones Stop Playing “Brown Sugar”; Song was Originally Called “Black Pussy”

The Rolling Stones will forever be known as the most successful wiggers in rock ’n’ roll history. With his massive lips — seriously, they’re the size of Michelin tires — lead singer Mick Jagger once told the story of how, as an avid rhythm and blues fan and aspiring singer, he accidentally bit off part of his tongue in gym class and rushed home to record himself singing, hoping it made him sound even blacker.

The band’s 1971 single “Brown Sugar” was originally titled “Black Pussy,” but Jagger decided the title was too “nitty-gritty.” It reached #1 in the United States and Canada and #2 in England and Northern Ireland. Its opening lyrics are:

Gold Coast slave ship bound for cotton fields
Sold in the market down in New Orleans
Scarred old slaver knows he’s doin’ all right
Hear him whip the women just around midnight
Brown Sugar, how come you taste so good?
Brown Sugar, just like a young girl should. . . .

You can buy Jim Goad’s Whiteness: The Original Sin here.

Jagger, who reportedly wrote the lyrics in 45 minutes, penned the song around the time he was hopping around with black girlfriends such as Marsha Hunt (who bore his first child) and Claudia Linnear. The band has played “Brown Sugar” live more than any of their other songs with the exception of “Jumpin’ Jack Flash.”

Jagger also once said that he didn’t want to play 1965’s “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction,” their first #1 hit in the US, when he was 40 years old. He is now 78, and the only other original Stones member, Keith Richards, is 77. You might as well call them the Kidney Stones at this point. The band’s bass player and drummer are now black.

But now, four dates into yet another tiresome American tour, the Stones have caved to public pressure and removed “Brown Sugar” from their setlist.

Back in 1995, Jagger had said of “Brown Sugar”:

God knows what I’m on about in that song. It’s such a mishmash. All the nasty subjects in one go. I never would write that song now. I would probably censor myself. I’d think, “Oh God, I can’t. I’ve got to stop. I can’t just write raw like that.”

“Brown Sugar” is also slang for heroin. Guitarist Keith Richards — who has done enough heroin to kill 10,000 Sid Viciouses — recently commented about the song’s controversy:

I’m trying to figure out with the sisters quite where the beef is. Didn’t they understand this was a song about the horrors of slavery? But they’re trying to bury it. At the moment I don’t want to get into conflicts with all of this shit. But I’m hoping that we’ll be able to resurrect the babe in her glory somewhere along the track.

So they’ve gone from whipping slave girls to being whipped by the woke mob. Oh, how the mighty wiggers have fallen.

NFL Coach Resigns After His Hilarious Emails are Leaked

Black Americans are as statistically overrepresented in the ranks of professional football players as they are when it comes to committing homicide.

With his Nordic features and blond hair, Jon Gruden was a white NFL coach until last week. Back in 2003, he led the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to a decisive Super Bowl victory over what were then known as the Oakland Raiders. In the interim, the Raiders moved to Los Angeles, then back to Oakland, and then finally to Las Vegas. Gruden had coached the team for four years until a decade-old email emerged where he had mocked a black players’ representative for his gigantic lips. The scandal led to Gruden’s resignation.

The emails were leaked in the course of an NFL internal investigation of the “Washington Football Team” — which has borne that stupid generic name since the summer of 2020 after it was determined that their previous name of 87 years, the “Washington Redskins,” was deeply hurtful to the “indigenous” American warriors whose primitive technology and superstitious ways led to them being steamrolled by European conquerors. In the course of poring over 650,000 emails, the NFL’s cultural headhunters claim that Gruden had committed the following indiscretions:

Regarding NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith, Gruden wrote that “Dumboriss [sic] Smith has lips the size of michellin [sic] tires.”
He referred to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell as a “faggot” and a “clueless anti football pussy.”
Referring the NFL’s courting of black homosexual football player Michael Sam by the Los Angeles Rams, Gruden accused Goodell of pressuring the Rams’ management to hire “queers.”
He called then-Vice President Joe Biden a “nervous clueless pussy.”
Gruden told then-Redskins President Bruce Allen that he objected to the NFL’s hiring of female referees. He also stood accused of receiving — not sending, but receiving — photos from Allen of topless Washington cheerleaders.
Regarding the email about his gigantic Ubangi lips, DeMaurice Smith wrote the following on Twitter:

This is not about an email as much as it is about a pervasive belief by some that people who look like me can be treated as less. The email has also revealed why the comments by some with powerful platforms to explain this away are insidious and hypocritical. It is as if there is a need to protect football above the values of equality, inclusion, and respect. The powerful in our business have to embrace that football itself has to be better, as opposed to making excuses to maintain the status quo.

With all due respect, “DeMaurice,” he said your lips were not “less” — he said they were more. He didn’t say you were worse at having big lips, he said you were better.

Writing for the increasingly anti-white USA Today, the paper’s “Race and Equality Editor” Mike Freeman flared his giant nostrils to derisively snort:

Jon Gruden’s emails [are] not just an NFL problem. They’re symbolic of societal white grievance. . . . They read like a road map of white grievance and go to a larger issue of how a significant swath of white men (not all, of course) feel about the changing power dynamics in the country. . . . It’s rare to peel back a public curtain and see unvarnished, white grievance bro culture in action, but that’s what you see with his emails. . . . You cannot tell the story of Gruden without telling the story of American white grievance.

Don’t tell me what I can’t do. Mike Freeman — who, like DeMaurice Smith, also has giant lips — is the one who can’t tell the story without complaining about “white grievance bro culture.”

Carl Nassib is a white NFL player who, until last week, was coached by Gruden. Nassib bears the dubious honor of being the National Football League’s first openly gay active player. Even though the football season is in full swing, Nassib asked for a personal day off to “process” the emotional wreckage that Gruden’s emails inflicted upon him. It was granted by the Raiders’ General Manager Mike Mayock.

Interestingly — and predictably — when the Raiders were in Oakland in 2019, a black player of theirs, Antonio Brown, called Mayock a “cracker” and threatened to assault him. Brown was not punished for this behavior.

Houston quarterback Deshaun Watson — the “Deshaun” should tip you off to his race — has been accused of sexual assault by two dozen women and still has a job. Tampa Bay cornerback Richard Sherman was busted for domestic violence over the summer — but continues to play.

But Jon Gruden alienates the NFL’s one gay player and correctly states that black people have gigantic lips, and boom — he’s gone.

In his defense, Gruden has said the following about himself:

I don’t have a blade of racism.

I don’t have a racial bone in my body, and I’ve proven that for 58 years.

I don’t have an ounce of racism in me.

None of it helped him.

This is literally how every liberal thinks. Every last one. This is their science.
https://gab.com/RealRedElephants/posts/1...6126676111