Quote:In the words of George’s brother Philonise, the video “changed the world.”

“She was the one who recorded a motion cinema picture that set the world on fire,” he said just over a year later, after the video served as a key piece of evidence in Chauvin’s trial and conviction.

https://www.unz.com/article/24-black-on-...ulsa-1921/

Carjacker Who Shot and Killed Elderly White Man Acquitted of Murder Because Elderly White Men Are Scary
Look at this picture. Which person looks scary to you?

On the left is 28-year-old Devon Dunham, who last week was acquitted on murder charges for a 2017 incident in Hardeeville, South Carolina. On the right is Ernest Martin Stevens, a 77-year-old white man whom Dunham shot and killed after firing eight bullets at him.

Mind you, Dunham confessed to shooting and killing Stevens shortly before 9:00 AM on August 10, 2017, as Stevens sat in his truck in a parking lot. He allegedly walked up to Stevens with his gun pointed and told him to hand over his truck. Then, when Stevens attempted to drive away, Dunham shot him dead.

According to the closing arguments by prosecutor Duffie Stone: “[Dunham] sees a target. A 77-year-old man alone with a running truck. What great fortune for Devon Dunham, a vulnerable elderly man by himself. He shot Mr. Stevens because he was losing his ride.” Stone also said that none of the facts of the incident were being disputed because “most of what I told you Devon Dunham told you” in his confession to police.

But according to Dunham’s defense lawyer, his client is “not the best communicator” and was “sleep-deprived” when he gave his confession. He suggested to the jury that Dunham, as a black American man, may have become frightened when he saw the undeniably terrifying specter of an elderly white man sitting in a truck. The judge told the jury to disregard this theory, but juries are dumb. The jury, after deliberating for less than two hours, ruled that even though Dunham fired eight shots at Stevens and killed him, the prosecution could not prove “intent to harm.”

As the verdict was read, Dunham reportedly sighed in relief and “softly fist-bumped” his lawyer.

If you’re white and living in America, pack your bags and get out while you can. This will get much worse before it ever has a chance of getting better. ***Goad

I took a rare day off on Memorial Day, but it had nothing to do with mourning dead American soldiers. Naturally, this didn’t stop me from being bombarded by the endlessly treacly and corny “conservative” online finger-wagging about how I need to honor all the dead soldiers who ostensibly shed their blood to protect my freedoms.

Exactly what “freedoms” are you talking about there, Gomer Pyle? I hardly have the freedom to speak. I have zero freedom to refuse working from January 1 to at least mid-April every year simply so the government can extort the fruits of my labor and spend it on more wars.

I can’t think of the last American war that I thought was justified, and I keep drawing blanks when I attempt to comprehend why sending young men overseas to either die or come back maimed and psychotic has the slightest thing to do with “preserving our cherished freedoms.”

About a quarter-century ago I read IRA activist Bernadette Devlin’s autobiographical The Price of My Soul, and no amount of Googling enabled me to find the first line of the book, but from memory, it went something like this: “My father went to fight on behalf of the British in [name of war] and returned home with one leg.” It was one of the most compelling opening salvos of any book I’ve ever read.

My father went to fight on behalf of “American freedom” in World War II and returned home shell-shocked and hopelessly addicted to alcohol. I remember my mother telling me of how she would pray every night — to no avail — that his drunken tantrums would cease. He drank a full bottle of whiskey or Scotch every day from 1945 until 1980. He stopped drinking a year before he died, but by then his body was too wrecked to salvage.

My brother went to fight on behalf of “American freedom” in Vietnam and also returned home shell-shocked and hopelessly addicted to alcohol. Sometime in the mid-80s, he swapped out the booze for a 12-pill-a-day habit of opioids, muscle relaxers, sleeping pills, anti-anxiety pills, and antidepressants. It sucked the soul out of the first and only hero I’ve ever had.

In early 2007 while we were eating at a Thai restaurant, I told my brother that I noticed he never actually talked about what he did in Vietnam. I asked him if he’d engaged in direct combat.

He told me that he had. As part of the Army, his role was to crouch in the jungle and start shooting in the direction of the Viet Cong, and when he and the other grunts successfully lured the gooks out from their hiding place, American choppers would come in and slaughter them right before his eyes.

And that’s all he got to tell me, because at that point, he took off his glasses, started crying uncontrollably, and muttered, “Bush doesn’t know what he’s doing to these American kids in the Middle East.”

I knew then to never ask him about Vietnam again. But years after that conversation, he still wore his “Vietnam Vet” baseball cap as some sort of misguided tribute to the war that forever destroyed his mind.

Around the same time I read Bernadette Devlin’s The Price of My Soul, I also read 1935’s War is a Racket by former Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler — who, as grim fate would have it, was born only 16 miles from where my brother and I were born. These are the first lines of that polemical tract:

WAR is a racket. It always has been. . . . It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. . . . A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many.

You can buy Jim Goad’s Whiteness: The Original Sin here.

I am not sure why my father’s commanders told him he was dropping bombs on Germany, but it’s likely it had something to do with protecting our freedoms. What I’m almost certain of is that if he could have seen what America looks like in 2021, he would have preferred to wind up speaking German.

I know that they told my brother he was fighting communism over there so that we didn’t have to fight it over here, only for America to wind up far closer to communism in 2021 than modern Russia is.

If given the choice — which was a freedom I was denied, as I was never even asked — I would rather have had a functional father and brother than whatever illusory “freedoms” you claim I’m privileged to have in this country.

Can anyone explain to me precisely what these “freedoms” are? Beyond that, can you explain why you think it’s worth the cost?

The Revolutionary War was ostensibly fought as a tax revolution, but a mere decade after it was fought, George Washington sent troops into western Pennsylvania to crush the anti-tax Whiskey Rebellion.

The pro-war patriots seem to think that over 600,000 dead white soldiers were worth it to free four million black slaves in the Civil War, only for us to never even receive so much as a thank-you note from all the freed blacks.

They have convinced themselves that over 100,000 dead Americans and an additional 200,000 injured Americans justified us getting involved in World War I, but I bet not a single one of them could explain one thing that war had to do with freedom.

They appear to believe over 400,000 dead and an additional 600,000 or so wounded in World War II — which was ostensibly fought to save the Jews — wasn’t nearly enough and that we keep having to fight proxy wars for Israel up until the current day, but I bet none of them could explain a single thing we get in return or why we don’t have the freedom to criticize Jews without being destroyed.

Classical conservatism was completely against foreign interventionism. Whatever the modern GOP has morphed into has nothing to do with classical conservatism or liberty. Instead, it’s this giant rainbow-colored tumor strapped with nuclear missiles. How do these flag-waving, warmongering “conservatives” justify the post-9/11 wars that continue to cost American taxpayers over $32 million per hour?

Surely there are better ways to spend that money. One risks smearing any soldier who risked his life in the post-9/11 interventions as a sucker. Many of them appear to be people who weren’t smart enough for college but whose labor would have been much better spent fixing our highways or working in factories than blasting hajis.

And this has nothing to do with me being a peacenik. I’m obviously combative. But I don’t think many — if any — American soldiers are fighting for their own interests. They probably suffer a net loss for fighting in foreign wars. The only real wartime situation right now, as I see it, is at the Southern border. It’s an invasion. Put the troops there.

And why do we even need soldiers at this point? Just as we can get robots to flip burgers, we have plenty of machines that can turn sand into glass without ever experiencing PTSD.

I recall a great commercial they used to show in the early 70s on TV. You see an empty wheat field. Then two limos pull up. Then two men get out who are obviously supposed to be the US and Russian presidents. They start brawling in the field. The voiceover said, “This is how it should be.”

Instead, we have poor and working-class American men who are sometimes forced to offer themselves as cannon fodder because the elites who send them overseas have also sent all the jobs overseas. If there’s a freedom that should hold primacy over all others, it should be the freedom from having to risk your life — or at least your soul — to protect the interests of those who’ve never even been in a fistfight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp6btJhS66c

https://kfor.com/news/national/map-shows...ed-states/
WISCONSIN WINS!!!!!

A daily video, usually about 8 minutes long, bringing the latest perversion and destruction of our culture and society. 
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2Z2Mq65iCUE/

Jason Jones is a 72-year-old white man from northwest Missouri who now looks like this after attempting to aid a black couple who blew a tire on Interstate 75.

Jones says he was driving toward Kansas City when he spotted 19-year-old Choyce Davis and a young black female stranded at the roadside and made the near-fatal decision to help them. He drove the pair to two separate salvage businesses before finding a suitable replacement tire. But as he was driving them back to their car, Jones says, “something hit me on the top of the head.” Apparently, the unnamed black female began cracking him in the skull with a metal rod. While attempting to stop her, Jones said his van drove off the road and into a ditch, whereupon Jones jumped from his car, only to be set upon by Choyce Davis, who began choking him and punching him in the face.

Police showed up almost instantly and arrested the pair of reputed black assailants, who had tried to escape in Jones’s van but got stuck in the mud.

“There was nothing I could do,” Jones said. “I’m 72 years old. My energy was gone. There was nothing I could do but take it. . . . In today’s world, nobody does that and that was my thing. I’ve always stopped to help people. They’ve always appreciated it — until now. Now at my age, maybe I’ll think twice next time before I do it again.”

But many people won’t get a chance to think twice. Rather than attempting to be a Good Samaritan, it’s best to do nothing and join all the other Bad Samaritans.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson strikes again - CNNPolitics

Quote:Known for her sharp criticism of the Trump administration's moves and in the criminal proceedings of former Trump advisers Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, Jackson this week cut through Washington's noise again as she called former Attorney General William Barr's considerations for rolling out the Mueller report "public relations" in a records access lawsuit opinion.
Days later, in the criminal cases of two January 6 US Capitol riot defendants, she noted how former President Donald Trump was continuing to spread lies, potentially inspiring his supporters to strike again.
Trump "continues to propagate the lie that inspired the attack on a near daily basis," she wrote in an opinion Thursday keeping riot defendant Karl Dresch in jail. "And the anger surrounding the false accusation continues to be stoked by multiple media outlets as well as the state and federal party leaders who are intent on censuring those who dare to challenge the former President's version of events."