Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
https://www.westernjournal.com/judge-ord...ee-ballots
Judge Orders New Election After Discovering Unsettling Truth About Majority of Absentee Ballots
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
Congratulations. You’ve figured out how alleged election fraud is supposed to be handled.
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
You're right, that's how it is supposed to happen - too bad the SCOTUS didn't know that.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
Fraud is a crime. When there is a crime someone is busted. SCO doesn’t do that.
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Which case presented to them asked them to do that? There you go with your red herring, again.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Then why didn't Florida decide the national election in Bush v Gore? Who was it that decided that, again?
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
Focus man !
Take a second and review what his thread is about.
Posts: 6,764
Threads: 2,018
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
Who said:
Quote:One of the many reasons the SCO don't take cases is that they have no business taking them.
“If you want to know who rules over you, just look for who you are not allowed to criticize.”
― Voltaire
Posts: 5,069
Threads: 611
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation:
0
Q. Who said ?
A: Everyone. But most importantly the SCO themselves