First of all there was no originalism in Thomas' dissent.
The notion that the "loco parentis doctrine" applies to someone who was firmly in the custody her parents is the joke. Not a single justice or lessor court agree with that.
I seriously don't think Thomas is against the first amendment, he was just appeasing his puritan buddies.
No doctors were censored, real gov't censorship is illegal.
The notion that the "loco parentis doctrine" applies to someone who was firmly in the custody her parents is the joke. Not a single justice or lessor court agree with that.
I seriously don't think Thomas is against the first amendment, he was just appeasing his puritan buddies.
No doctors were censored, real gov't censorship is illegal.